Extracts from the Records of the India Office concerning Dehli

 

Bengal Consultations, 11th September 1806. IOR P/54/57, No. 29.

Letter from the Delhi Resident (Mr Seton) to Government, dated 21st August 1806.

Long letter explaining that the Emperor insisted on his stipend (58,000 Rs) being paid in Delhi rupees but that these were not easily available. They had to be bought on the open market, but there was a batta of 3% or more. In the letter he stated:

No mode of defeating this attempt [i.e. by the shroffs to charge high batta] appeared to me so effectual as that of increasing the local circulation of the Delhi rupees, by coining into that specie the Bareilly rupees then in the treasury. I found however, that from the inferior quality of this last specie and from the expense of coining and the wastage of the Delhi mint, the measure would be attended with loss, and that 100 Bareilly rupees would only produce 94Rs 14ans. Of course, the idea was abandoned.

Bengal Consultations, 21st May 1813. IOR P/8/17 No. 11-12.

From Charles Metcalf (Resident at Delhi) to Government, dated 17th April 1813.

I have the honor to transmit a copy of a letter from the First Assistant to this Residency applying for a percentage on the collection of the mint of Dilhee in the same manner in which a percentage is allowed in the customs of this territory.

The application is sufficiently explained in Mr Frasers’ letter and does not appear to require any comment on my part. If compliance or non-compliance would be supported to depend on any estimation of the merits of the individual at present having charge of the revenue office in this territory, I might venture to say that the zeal and ability evinced by Mr Fraser on all occasions and especially the substantial services which he has rendered in the revenue department of this territory, recommend him strongly for the favour and approbation of the Right Honorable the Governor General in Council.

To Delhi Resident, from Fraser, dated 15th April 1813.

Although the mint is under the superintendence of the officer in charge of the Revenue Department and the duties levied on it are similarly collected with the customs, the percentage allowed on the net customs receipts are not granted on the receipt of the mint.

I request that you will be pleased, should you not deem it improper, to solicit the sanction of Government for deducting in favour of the officer in charge of the Revenue Department the same percentage on the mint duties as allowed on those of customs.

From Government to Metcalf.

Ordered that the Resident at Delhi be informed that as the orders under which Mr Fraser receives a commission on the revenues for customs which may be collected cannot be considered applicable to the to the mint which is immediately under the management of the Resident, the Right Honorable the Governor General in Council cannot sanction the claim preferred by Mr Fraser.

See IOR P/162/69 pp115-118 for info about sending a qualified person with the machinery to Dehli

Bengal Consultations. IOR P/162/69 p318.

Letter from C. J. Metcalf to the Mint Committee at Calcutta dated 13th April 1816

The machinery dispatched from Calcutta for the Delhi mint has arrived but work is at a stand owing to the want of persons acquainted with the use of the machinery. The person appointed by your Committee to the office of foreman has not arrived and, if I am rightly informed, is dead.

Bengal Consultations. IOR P/162/70, no. 87.

From C. J. Metcalf to the Mint Committee at Calcutta dated 26th January 1818.

Everything being in readiness here for the coinage of the Farrukhabad rupee except only dies, I take the liberty of requesting that you will order a supply of dies of the Farrukhabad coinage to be sent to me by Dak Bangry or that you will authorise me to have them cut here, which can be done though not so well. And then, in either case, you will be pleased to cause orders to be issued for the receipt in the Honble Company’s provinces of the Farrukhabad rupee coined at Delhi, on a par with the Farrukhabad rupee proper.

My application for the dies proceeds from the supposition that it is necessary or desirable that the coinage of Delhi should correspond precisely, impression, as well as value, with that of Farrukhabad.

If in your judgement so exact a similarity is not requisite, we can make the dies here with any impression and the order for the currency of our coinage on a par with the Farrukhabad rupee is all that will be wanted. But I am apprehensive that as long as there is any perceptible distinction the money changers will make it a pretence for causing a difference of price in the markets.

Bengal Consultations. IOR P/162/70, No. 75.

Letter from the Mint Committee to the Mint Master (Saunders) dated the 16th March 1818.

I am instructed by the Committee superintending the affairs of the mint at this Presidency to request that you will prepare and transmit by Dawk Bangry a supply of dies of the Farrukhabad coinage to Mr. Metcalf, Resident at Delhi.

Bengal Consultations. IOR P/162/70, no. 88.

From the Mint Committee to Government dated 10th April 1818.

We have the honor to forward for the information of Government the copy of a letter received from the Resident at Delhi dated the 26th January last requiring a supply of dies of the Farrukhabad coinage and suggesting the necessity for giving currency by regulation to the rupees of that description coined at Delhi.

The orders of Government of the 7th August 1813, leave us no choice that [but?] to comply with the request of the Resident, and as there can be no doubt but that the dies for the proposed Delhi coinage will be best made at Calcutta where indeed those for Farrukhabad and Banaras have always been cut, we directed the Mint Master to prepare them with the least possible delay.

Before however finally dispatching the dies or preparing any order that may be necessary to give currency to the Farrukhabad rupee coined at Delhi, we beg leave to suggest to the Government the necessity of adopting some check over the standard weight and fineness of these rupees, not merely for security in these important points with respect to this coinage only, but for the protection of the Farrukhabad currency in general, the whole of which will be liable for discredit from any deficiency in the rupees in circulation, the coinage of which at Delhi or Farrukhabad it will now be impossible to discriminate.

Bengal Consultations. IOR P/162/70, no. 104.

Letter from Government to Calcutta Mint Committee dated 19th June 1818.

With reference to you letter of the 10th April last, I am directed by the Honourable the Vice President in Council to transmit for your information the accompanying copies of correspondence with the Resident at Delhi as noted in the margin. [The margin contains list of the documents quoted below].

Bengal Consultations. IOR P/162/72, No 78.

Letter from H. Middleton (Acting Resident at Dehli) to Calcutta Mint Committee, 17th November 1821.

I consider it my duty to report to you that there are several mint implements of apparently excellent manufacture at present deposited in the go-downs of this mint which will assuredly never be brought into any kind of use here.

The natives employed in the mint to coin a few hundred rupees once a year to present to his Majesty on the anniversary of his coronation do not even know the application or use of the articles to which I allude, and it strikes me that much of the apparatus requisite to complete the machinery is wanting.

The implements are lying rotting here to no purpose. If sold on account of Government in this city they would fetch a mere nothing and I should suppose the things might be very serviceable in some of the regular mints.

Perhaps they might be sent with advantage to Benares or Farruckabad or even to the Presidency, but on this point you will be better determined than I can venture to do, and I therefore solicit your orders. It is a pity that such work and such materials should be unemployed.

Bengal Consultations. IOR P/162/72, No 79.

Letter from the Mint Committee to Middleton (at Dehli), 18th December 1821.

I am directed by the Committee for superintending the affairs of the mint at this Presidency to acknowledge receipt of your letter bearing date the 17th ultimo and to request the apparatus therein alluded to may be dispatched to the Benares mint.

Bengal Consultations. IOR P/162/77, No 11.

Letter to Calcutta Mint Committee from Government dated 19th January 1827.

I am directed by the Vice President in Council to transmit to you the accompanying copy of a letter and its enclosures, from the Commissioner at Dehli, dated the 17th ultimo, and to request that a communication of your sentiments as to the expediency of establishing a copper coinage at Dehli, and generally as to the best mode of meeting the difficulties stated to exist in regard to the copper currency of that city.

To Government from C. Metcalf, 17th December 1826.

I have the honor to submit copies of correspondence with the magistrate and Collector of Dehlee relating to an alleged monopoly of copper coin by shuraffs and to a proposition for the establishment of a mint at Dehlie for a copper coinage,

Letter from J. Wells (secretary to the Commissioner of Delhee) from Metcalfe (Judge and Magistrate at Dehli), dated 17th August 1826.

I have the honor to report for the information of the Commissioner that much inconvenience has of late been felt by all classes of people in the city in consequence of the shroffs having combined to purchase all the copper pice procurable, and refusing to sell them excepting at a high rate fixed by themselves.

This combination is particularly complained of by the executive officers in charge of public works and Captain Smith informs me that at times he is not only unable to procure pice (the shroffs refusing to sell at any rate) but that a description of pice formerly received at an equal value has now been proscribed and declared by those monopolists to be of an inferior value.

I take the liberty of soliciting through you instructions from the Commissioner as to the propriety of my interfering to induce the shroffs to sell at the former nerick.

Letter to Metcalfe from Wells dated 18th August 1826

I am directed by the Commissioner to acknowledge receipt of your letter of the 17th instant relative to the monopoly of the Banyans of the city.

The Commissioner requests you to report whether at any time there was any fixed nerikh for copper pice and, if so, on what occasion it was first departed from. As far as his recollection extends the nerikh of pice was always variable.

Letter from Metcalfe to Wells dated 21st August 1826

In reply to your letter under date the 18th instant, I have the honor to state, for the information of the Commissioner, that there never was a fixed nerick for copper pice, but I never recalled it to have been so high as at present.

If it be deemed unadvisable to oblige them to sell at a fairer price, they are bound, I think, to receive back pice at the same rate at which they sell it, whereas now they refuse to take it back unless a batta be paid.

Letter to Metcalfe from Wells dated 7th September 1826

I am directed by the Commissioner to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 21st ultimo relative to the monopoly of pice by the banyans of the city and to inform you in reply that he trusts the evil will cure itself without positive interference on the part of the civil power.

Circular to Metcalfe from Sutherland (Acting Secretary to the Commissioner) dated 13th October 1826

The Commissioner requests you to report on the feasibility of establishing a mint for copper coins at Dihlee and the probable effect of such a measure in preventing the buying up and monopolizing of [Tukkas?].

To Sutherland from Vaughan (Collector at Dehli), dated 23rd October 1826

I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your letter dated the 13th instant on the subject of establishing a mint for copper coin at Dehli.

I have no doubt in my own mind that the proposed measure would be productive of good to the people and serve to check, in an effectual manner, the impositions now daily practiced by surraffs and others not only by the ordinary process of monopoly you allude to, but by taking advantage of the variety of the currency in point of place of coinage and metallic weight, which being numerous, the poorest portion of our subjects are placed at the mercy of the surraffs or brokers, whose sole source of livelihood consists in the exaction of discount, often optional, almost always exorbitant, the exchange of the silver medium into copper fluctuating from 42 pice to 55.

The institution of a mint for copper coinage would be beneficial in my opinion.

1st because the quantity of the currency and the time of its issue being optional, monopoly would cease immediately that the maximum of the demand became once regulated by an adequate issue of the coin.

2nd because the adjustment of a standard mint arte of exchange would frustrate all fictitious ones.

3rd because the uniformity of weight, the peculiarity of a Government mint issue, would soon depreciate the base currency to its intrinsic metal value, lead to its speedy absorption by the mint, and reissue in legal fashion as to the Presidency.

At present the copper currency seems to derive its character, as such, from the intrinsic value of the commodity itself, and the general confidence arising from the knowledge of that value therefore is liable to variation in proportion to the quality of the commodity and the credit of the day. A government mint currently affording security, in point of weight and purity to the coin, and accompanied with the implied declaration from authority of being received back at a fixed rate, would impart an immutable value and credit to the circulation.

5th Because a Government mint would prove a source of revenue to the state that at the same time conferred an important benefit on the people, since metal may be converted into coin for individuals at a less rate than could possibly be effected otherwise.

6th Because the experiment here may lead to a general adoption of the principle all over the country and secure proportionate good.

Letter to Vaughan from Sutherland, dated 28th October 1826

In acknowledging the receipt of your letter of the 23rd instant, the Commissioner requests that you will have the goodness to furnish a plan for the formation of a mint for the copper coinage.

From Metcalfe to Sutherland dated 25th October 1826

In reply to your letter under date the 13th instant I have the honor to state that in my opinion the establishment of the mint for copper coin would for the future prevent the monopoly of pice by the shroffs of the city and I can foresee no difficulty in establishing it since many of the persons formerly employed are now at Dehlee, pensioners of Government on 2/3rds of their original salaries.

From Vaughan to Hislop (Acting Secretary to the Commissioner) dated 26th November 1826

He sets out a plan for the mint

…My proposition is to adopt for uniformity sake, and for facility of keeping accounts, the following plan, which is nearly similar to that in practice at the Presidency

 

120 pice of 8 massas each to be made out of each one seer of copper the value of which never exceeds

1:13

Manufacture of this one seer of copper into 120 pice

0:1

Total expense

1:14

 

Establishment

1 mint Darogah including expense of stationary per mensum

40: :

1 Mohurrir

16: :

1 Chupprassy

4: :

20 artificers at different rates of pay average each 6 rupees

120: :

Total monthly expense

180: :

The above establishment per diem Rs6 being competent to coin per diem 2 maunds and 12 seers each at 1 anna per seer is equal to

5:12

The excess of charge per diem

-:4

Will be amply defrayed by the variation in the price of the metal which sometimes falls as low as 1 rupee 6 annas per seer

 

 

At the above rate of coinage the annual issue will amount to about 63,000 rupees which must be considerably below the Dehlee demand. It will be easy however, after experience has ascertained the quantity necessary to meet the public demand, to increase the establishment of artificers to the requisite extent.

If the establishment of a mint be sanctioned, it may be advisable to notify by proclamation that the Government mint at Dehlee will receive and disburse copper coin at the fixed rate of 64 pice for a Kuldar rupee, whenever presented.

1st July 1827[1]. Bengal Consultations.

Letter from the Garrison Engineer to the Acting Secretary to Government in the Territorial Department, dated 1st July 1827

The letter explained why the cost of building works was increasing.

 

Average price of exchange of pice at Dehli

 

 

Pice

Dumries

Cowries

1824

July

50

 

15

 

August

50

½

 

 

September

50

1

 

 

October

50

1 ½

 

 

November

50

1 ½

4

 

December

51

½

12

1825

January

51

1

3 ½

 

February

51

2 ½

12

 

March

52

3

9

 

April

53

3

2

 

May

54

 

6

 

June

54

½

11

 

July

56

½

5

 

August

56

2

4

 

September

54

 

10

 

October

52

2 ½

10

 

November

53

3 ½

11

 

December

55

3

9

1826

January

55

3

 

 

February

55

2 ½

2

 

March

54

2 ½

12

 

April

52

3 ½

4

 

May

53

2

2

 

June

51

2 ½

10

 

July

48

 

4

 

August

47

½

10

 

September

45

3 ½

11 ½

 

October

43

3

4

 

November

45

 

1

 

December

46

 

4

1827

January

45

 

12

 

February

44

1

10

 

March

44

½

2

 

April

44

1

 

 

May

44

2 ½

1

 

June

44

1 ½

1 ¼

 

Bengal Consultations. IOR P/162/77, No 89.

Letter to Calcutta Mint Committee from the Judge & Magistrate at Dehli, dated 26th October 1827.

…The wages of labor are paid in the Dihlee pice, a few of which are herewith transmitted.

Bengal Consultations. IOR P/162/78, No 34.

Letter from the Resident at Dehli (Edw. Colebrooke) to Government, dated 13th February 1829

Long letter proposing to re-establish the copper mint at Dehli.

…The abolition of the mint for copper coinage at Dehlee was consequent on the abolition of the mint for Dehlee rupees in 1818, which had in view the filling up the gap which would be thus occasioned in the circulation of Dehlee rupees by a more extended circulation of the new Farruckabad rupee coined at Farruckabad. But as the Dehlee mint for coining copper pice is not once mentioned in the correspondence it does not appear what means were then contemplated for filling up the additional deficiency which would be occasioned in this branch of the circulation by the abolition of its particular mint…

Bengal Consultations. IOR P/162/78, No 35.

Letter to Government from the Mint Committee, dated 23rd April 1829.

…Under these circumstances we cannot think it will be expedient to re-establish the mint at Dehlee…

Bengal Consultations. IOR P/162/47, 3rd April 1832, No6.

Letter from the Resident and Chief Commissioner at Delhi to Government, dated 16th March 1832

Letters and enclosures stating that there should be no problem with using the new copper coins in the Delhi area.

c1835.

Concerning presentation of nuzaars to the King of Dehli