View/Print .pdf

Ganjam

No Coins traced

 

Ingeram

No Coins traced

 

Madapollam Mint? – Copper, Cash –c1701 to 1702

A new company called the English Company Trading to the East Indies, was created in 1698 and established their main site in India at Madapollam. They appear to have obtained rights to issue coins and Pridmore attributes this copper cash coin to that mint.

 

Madras 163 Madopollum Cash Obv

Madras 164 Madopollum Cash Rev

A heart shaped shield with a 4 on top. Within the shield are the letters EEIC.

A group of standing deities.

 

Actual Weight (g)

1.63-2.24

 

Actual Diameter (mm)

9.5-12.8

 

Composition

Copper

 

Catalogue

Cat No.

Photo Link

Pr. No.

Provenance

Comments

Rarity

5.14

√ 535.

287

Ste, HC, RJ, Oswal, Jay Lion, SA

Ref: BM. See photo for a specimen with no outline to the balemark

R

5.15

√ 535c.

-

HC, RJ

Retrograde letters in balemark.

RR

 

Masulipatam (Machlipatan) Mint – Silver, Double Rupee et infra

For both the silver and copper coins the RYs initially refer to the rule of Ālamgīr II but in AH 1190 they start referring to Shāh ‘Ālam II.

For coins dated 1172 and earlier, see French

 

sikka mubārak bādshāh ghāzī ‘ālamgīr (= the auspicious coin of the Victorious Emperor ‘Ālamgīr)

ẓarb machhlīpatan sanah [RY] julūs maimanat mānūs (= Struck at Machhlīpatan in the [RY] year of tranquil prosperity)

 

 

Double Rupee

Rupee

Half Rupee

Quarter Rupee

Sixteenth Rupee

Official Weight (g)

22.52

11.26

5.64

2.82

0.70

Actual Weight (g)

22.55-22.62

11.01-11.27

5.27-5.64

2.76-2.82

0.62

Actual Diameter (mm)

32.4

18.8-23.8

17.0-18.9

12.4-15.0

~10

Composition

Silver

 

Catalogue

Cat No.

Photo Link

Pr. No.

Denomination

AH

RY

Provenance

Comments

Rarity

5.16

√ 536.

291

Double Rupee

1194

21

Bhandare, Noon

Three specimens known.

RRR

5.17

√ 538.

-

Rupee

1173

5

Bald, ANS

RR

5.17A

√ 538c.

-

”

1173

6

HC, Tody

RR

5.18

√ 539.

-

”

1174

6

Anon, Bhandare but no RY, Noon

RR

5.19

√ 540.

-

”

1174

7

RJ, Noman,

RR

5.20

√ 541.

-

”

1176

8

Ste, RJ

RR

5.21

√ 541c.

-

”

1177

9

RJ

RR

5.23

√ 543.

-

”

1178

9

Jan Lingen but AH not clear, Bald

The previously listed coin dated 1178/5 may be RY 9 with the tail missing or off the flan.

RR

5.23C

√ 543c.

-

”

1178

11

RJ

RR

5.24

√ 544.

-

”

1179

 

ClassNG, ANS

RR

5.24C

√ 544c.

-

”

1180

1x

RJ

RR

5.25

545.

-

”

1182

xx

 

Ref: Puddester but not confirmed

RR

5.26

√ 545c.

-

”

1184

15

HC, RJ

May be AH 1183

RR

5.27

546.

-

”

11xx

17

 

Ref: Puddester but not confirmed

RR

5.28

√ 547.

-

”

1189

xx

RJ

RR

5.29

548.

-

”

119x

21

 

Ref: Puddester but not confirmed

RR

5.30

√ 548c.

-

”

1194

xx

Sachin Arun Gupte, Bald

RR

5.31

√ 549.

-

”

1195

2x

Ste, RJ, Noon

RR

5.32

√ 550c.

-

”

1197

23

RJ, Noon but no RY. SA

 

RR

5.33

√ 550.

292

”

1197

24

Ste, HC

 

RR

5.34

√ 551.

-

”

1198

2x

Ste

RR

5.35

√ 552.

-

”

1199

2x

Ste

RR

5.36

√ 553.

-

”

1200

26?

RJ

RR

5.37

√ 554.

-

”

1202

2x

HC, RJ

RR

5.38

√ 555.

293

”

1205

xx

RJ

 

RR

5.39

√ 555c.

”

1208?

3x

HC, Bald

 

RR

5.40

√ 557.

293A

”

1211

3x

Ste

 

RR

5.41

558.

294

”

1212

xx

 

 

RR

5.42

√ 559.

295

”

1213

xx

Oswal but AH not clear, Zeno

 

RR

5.43

560.

-

”

1214

xx

 

Ref: BM.

RR

5.44

√ 561c.

-

Half Rupee

1177

9

RJ

 

RRR

5.44C

√ 561e.

-

”

118x

xx

Ash

RRR

5.45

√ 561.

296

”

1198

2x

Pr

Ref: BM

RRR

5.46

562.

297

”

1199

2x

 

 

RRR

5.47

√ 563.

298

”

1204

3x

HC, ANS

RRR

5.48

√ 564.

-

Quarter Rupee

1176

xx

Ste, RJ

RR

5.49

√ 565.

-

”

1189

xx

SA, RJ

See photos for possible AH 1187?

RR

5.50

√ 565c.

299

”

1200

2x

ANS

Ref also: BM

RR

5.51

566.

-

”

1202

2x

 

Ref: Lingen.

RR

5.52

√ 567.

-

”

xxxx

3x

Noon

RR

5.54

√ 568c.

-

”

1214

xx

Howard Simmons, HC

RR

The previously listed AH 1210/3x quarter rupee, based on Pr. 300, is actually AH 1200 from the ANS shown above

 

Type   Type

This coin was previously listed as 5.55, a sixteenth rupee from the Fitzwilliam museum, Cambridge. However, there is insufficient detail visible to conclude that this is correct.

 

Masulipatam Fanams

Sometime before 1792, an attempt was made to introduce silver fanams into the Northern Circars.

 

Madras Consultations 1792. IOR p/241/30, p 123

 Letter to Government from the Masulipatam Council, dated 30th December 1791.

We have the honor of acknowledging the receipt of your letter of the 14th instant, and of informing you that we do not conceive any part of the present distress to be owing to want of small currency, as there is a superabundance of copper coin and a sufficient number of silver quarter rupees in circulation, to answer all the purposes of small coin. A coinage of fanams and double fanams was formerly made trial of in this district, but were so often counterfeited that Government found it necessary to order them to be called in and suppressed. The coining silver fanams at this time might also, we conceive, still further depress the value of copper coin, and of course, affect those who have any quantity of it in their possession…

 

Masulipatam (Machhlipatan) Mint – Copper, Single and Half Dubs

These coins appear to have been struck firstly in the name of ‘Ālamgīr II (with his regnal years) and then, from 1190, in the name of Shāh ‘Ālam II (with his regnal years).

 

sanah julūs mubārak [AH] (= Auspicious year of accession [AH])

ẓarb bandar machhlīpatan sanah [mubārak] (= struck at the port of Machhlīpatan in the auspicious year of his reign)

 

 

Dub

Half Dub

Actual Weight (g)

12.53-14.52

6.10-6.90

Actual Diameter (mm)

15.7-22.2

13.4-18.1

Composition

Copper

 

Catalogue

Cat No.

Photo Link

Pr. No.

Denomination

AH

RY

Provenance

Comments

Rarity

RYs of ‘Ālamgīr II

5.56

√ 570e.

301

Dub

1173

5

RJ

RR

5.57

√ 571.

”

”

1174

 

Ste, RJ

 

5.57C.

√ 571c.

”

”

1175

4

Craig

AH/RY dates mismatched

 

5.57E.

√ 571e.

”

”

1175

8

RJ

 

5.57G.

√ 571g.

”

”

1176

7

RJ

AH/RY dates mismatched

 

5.58

572.

”

”

1177

 

 

Ref: BM

 

5.58C

√ 572b.

”

”

1178

 

RJ

 

5.58E

572c.

”

”

1179

11

 

Ref: Steve Album, list 57 (1989), #1128 (but no photo)

 

5.59

573.

”

”

1180

 

 

Ref: Wiggins

 

5.59C

√ 573b.

”

”

1183

15

RJ

 

5.59E

√ 573e.

”

”

1184

16

Craig

 

5.59H

√ 573c.

”

”

1186

81

Craig

RY 18 retrograde

 

5.60

√ 575.

”

”

1187

18

Ste, Bald

 

5.60A

√ 575c.

”

”

1187

19?

RJ

 

5.61

√ 574.

”

”

1188

19

RJ

Ref: BM

 

5.62

√ 574c.

”

”

1189

21

RJ

 

5.63

√ 574e.

”

”

1190

2x

RJ

 

RYs of Shāh ‘Ālam II

5.63C

√ 574g.

”

”

1191

17

RJ, Jay Raiveeson

 

5.64

√ 576.

”

”

1192

18

RJ, Jay Raiveeson

 

5.64B

√ 576b.

”

”

1192

19

Noon

 

5.64C

√ 576a.

”

”

1192

20

RJ

 

5.64D

√ 576c.

”

”

1193

19

Craig, RJ, Jay Raiveeson

 

5.64E

√ 576d.

”

”

1194

20?

Jay Raiveeson

 

5.64F

√ 576e.

”

”

1195

2x

RJ

 

5.64G

√ 576g.

”

”

1196

22

RJ

 

5.64J

√ 576i.

”

”

1197

23?

RJ, Jay Raiveeson

 

5.65

√ 577.

”

”

1198

24

Ste, Jay Raiveeson, RJ

 

 

5.66

√ 578.

”

”

1199

2x

Vaikunta Chary R, Noon, Jay Raiveeson

 

 

5.66C

√ 578c.

”

”

1200

27

Jay Raiveeson

 

 

5.67

√ 579.

”

”

1201

27

RJ

 

 

5.67A

√ 579b.

”

”

1201

28

Noon

 

5.68

√ 579c.

”

”

1211

37

RJ

 

5.69

√ 579e.

”

”

1212

3x

RJ

 

5.70

√ 580.

”

”

1213

39

HC, Noon

 

5.72

√ 581.

”

”

1214

40

Noon

 

5.72C

√ 579d.

”

”

1215

4x

Jay Raiveeson

 

5.73

√ 582.

”

”

1217

4x

RJ

Ref: BM

 

5.74

√ 582c.

”

”

1218

4x

RJ

 

5.74A

√ 582d.

”

”

1219

45?

RJ

RY not clear

 

5.74C

√ 582e.

”

”

1221

47

RJ

 

5.75

√ 583.

”

”

1222

47

Ste, SA

 

RYs of ‘Ālamgīr II

5.76

√ 584.

302

Half Dub

1174

5

RJ

 

RR

5.76A

√ 584b.

-

”

1174

7

RJ

 

 

5.76B

√ 584b2.

-

”

1175

7

RJ

 

 

5.76C

√ 584b3.

-

”

1176

8

RJ

 

 

5.76D

√ 584b6.

-

”

1177

8

RJ

 

 

5.77

√ 584c.

-

”

1186

18

ANS

 

5.77C

√ 584c3.

-

”

1187

19

Jay Raiveeson, RJ

 

5.77D

√ 584c6.

-

”

1188

19

Jay Raiveeson, RJ

 

RYs of Shāh ‘Ālam II

5.77F

√ 584c9.

-

”

1190

17

Jay Raiveeson

 

5.77H

√ 584c11.

-

”

1192

xx

Jay Raiveeson

 

5.77J

√ 584c13.

-

”

1193

xx

Jay Raiveeson

 

5.77L

√ 584c16.

-

”

1195

xx

Jay Raiveeson

 

5.77M

√ 584c18.

-

”

1196

22?

Jay Raiveeson

RY not clear

 

5.77P

√ 584c21.

-

”

1198

25?

Craig

RY not clear

 

5.77R

584d.

-

”

1200

xx

 

BM

 

5.77T

√ 584d3.

-

”

1202

xx

RJ

 

5.77Y

√ 584d9.

-

”

1211

xx

RJ

 

5.78

√ 584e.

-

”

1212

3x

HC

Most specimens do not show date. Usually off flan

 

5.78

√ 584g.

-

”

xxx2

45

Noon

 

 

The coins below have dates in unusual places and are worthy of further thought and investigation. Bob Johnston wrote the following:

See the following photos of a dub with mint name Machhlīpatan but with RY 41 on the top of the obverse rather than the normal dot groups.

 

242 Madras Dub RY 41 Obv   243 Madras Dub RY 41 Rev

13.32 gr and 19.7-21.1 mm

 

See also the photos below of a similar half dub with RY 34 at the top of the obverse rather than its normal position right of “patan” on the reverse.

 

244 Madras Half Dub RY 34 Obv   245 Madras Half Dub RY 34 Rev

6.44 gr and 16.1-18.3 mm

 

The normal position of the AH date would be off the flan at the bottom of the obverse on the dub. The few British dubs seen, that show the top of the obverse, have two dot groups here as on the earlier paisa, including Aurangzeb.

The next photos from Hemanth Chopra are of a similar dub/paisa with RY 6 or 9 at top.

 

246 Madras Dub RY 6 or 9 Obv   247 Madras Dub RY 6 or 9 Rev

 

Finally, the last photos, also from Hemanth Chopra are another example with an undetermined single digit RY, rather than dots at top of the obverse. 

 

248 Madras Dub RY on Obverse Obv   249 Madras Dub RY on Obverse Rev

 

These show there is no AH date at bottom left of the obverse and the RY 6/9 is too early to be an Aurangzeb issue. Unlike these two coins, the RY 34 half dub shows what appears to be the tops of two flat topped numbers or parts of letters in the position where the AH date normally is. Could these coins have been minted at another mint such as Gangam, Vizagapatam and possibly Madapollam, or the Dutch mints at Jaggernaikporam or Bimlapatam (see Lingen in ONS 161 Supplement pp. 11-12)?

 

Masulipatam Mint – Copper, M Dub

 

sanah julūs mubārak [AH] (= Auspicious year of accession [AH])

M with Persian inscription: ẓarb bandar machhlīpatan sanah [RY] [maimanat?] (= struck at the port of Machhlīpatan in the auspicious year of his reign)

RY next to M

 

 

Dub

Half Dub

Actual Weight (g)

13.00-13.72

6.04-6.36

Actual Diameter (mm)

17.5-20.6

15.3-16.4

Composition

Copper

 

Catalogue

Cat No.

Photo Link

Pr. No.

Denomination

AH

RY

Provenance

Comments

Rarity

5.79

√ 585.

303

Dub

[xxxx]

20

Ste, RJ

 

RR

5.80

√ 586.

”

”

1218

[xx]

RJ, Lawrence Noronha

Ref: JNSI (1963) p117, BM.. AH1218 on both sides

RR

5.81

587.

”

”

[xxxx]

28

 

M upside-down. Ref: Lingen. No sales traced.

RR

5.82

√ 588.

-

Half Dub

[xxxx]

25

Anon

Ref: Fitzwilliam museum. No sales traced

RRR

5.82C

√ 588c.

-

”

1xxx

RJ

RRR

 

Vizagapatam Mint – Early Coinages – Silver, Vizagapatam Rupee

Mint name not certain but probably poorly written Machhlīpatan not Vizagapatam

 

 

 

VizagapatamRupeeObv

MohurAlamgirIIObvScrip

VizagapatamRupeeRev

sikka mubārak bādshāh ghāzī ‘ālamgīr (= the auspicious coin of the Victorious Emperor ‘Ālamgīr).

ẓarb vizagapatam? sanah [RY] julūs maimanat mānūs (= Struck at Vizagapatam? in the [RY] year of tranquil prosperity).

 

Actual Weight (g)

11.16

Actual Diameter (mm)

?

Composition

Silver

Edge

Plain

 

Catalogue

Cat No.

Photo Link

Pr. No.

AH

Provenance

Comments

Rarity

5.83

√ 588m

-

1206

Bald

Attribution to Vizagapatam doubtful

RRR

 

Vizagapatam Mint – Copper, Vizagapatam Dub

No Coins traced. Probably struck with the mint name Machhlipatan