View/Print .pdf
No Coins traced
No Coins traced
A new company called the English Company Trading to the
|
|
|
|
A heart shaped shield with a 4 on top.
Within the shield are the letters EEIC. |
A group of standing deities. |
|
Actual
Weight (g) |
1.63-2.24 |
|
Actual
Diameter (mm) |
9.5-12.8 |
|
Composition |
Copper |
Catalogue
Cat No.
|
Photo Link |
Pr. No. |
Provenance |
Comments |
Rarity |
|
5.14 |
√ 535. |
287 |
Ste, HC, RJ, Oswal, Jay Lion, SA |
Ref: BM. See photo for a specimen
with no outline to the balemark |
R |
|
5.15 |
√ 535c. |
- |
HC, RJ |
Retrograde letters in balemark. |
RR |
For both the silver and copper coins the RYs
initially refer to the rule of Ālamgīr II but in AH 1190 they start
referring to Shāh ‘Ālam II.
For coins dated 1172 and earlier, see French
|
|
|
|
|
|
sikka
mubārak bādshāh ghāzī ‘ālamgīr (= the auspicious coin of the Victorious
Emperor ‘Ālamgīr) |
ẓarb
machhlīpatan sanah [RY] julūs maimanat mānūs (= Struck at Machhlīpatan in the [RY]
year of tranquil prosperity) |
||
|
Double Rupee |
Rupee |
Half Rupee |
Quarter Rupee |
Sixteenth Rupee |
|
|
22.52 |
11.26 |
5.64 |
2.82 |
0.70 |
|
|
Actual
Weight (g) |
22.55-22.62 |
11.01-11.27 |
5.27-5.64 |
2.76-2.82 |
0.62 |
|
Actual
Diameter (mm) |
32.4 |
18.8-23.8 |
17.0-18.9 |
12.4-15.0 |
~10 |
|
Silver |
|||||
|
Cat No. |
Photo Link |
Pr. No. |
Denomination |
AH |
RY |
Provenance |
Comments |
Rarity |
|
5.16 |
√ 536. |
291 |
Double Rupee |
1194 |
21 |
Bhandare, Noon |
Three specimens known. |
RRR |
|
5.17 |
√ 538. |
- |
Rupee |
1173 |
5 |
Bald, ANS |
RR |
|
|
5.17A |
√ 538c. |
- |
” |
1173 |
6 |
HC, Tody |
RR |
|
|
5.18 |
√ 539. |
- |
” |
1174 |
6 |
Anon, Bhandare but no RY, Noon |
RR |
|
|
5.19 |
√ 540. |
- |
” |
1174 |
7 |
RJ, Noman, |
RR |
|
|
5.20 |
√ 541. |
- |
” |
1176 |
8 |
Ste, RJ |
RR |
|
|
5.21 |
√ 541c. |
- |
” |
1177 |
9 |
RJ |
RR |
|
|
5.23 |
√ 543. |
- |
” |
1178 |
9 |
Jan Lingen but AH not clear, Bald |
The previously listed coin dated
1178/5 may be RY 9 with the tail missing or off the flan. |
RR |
|
5.23C |
√ 543c. |
- |
” |
1178 |
11 |
RJ |
RR |
|
|
5.24 |
√ 544. |
- |
” |
1179 |
|
ClassNG, ANS |
RR |
|
|
5.24C |
√ 544c. |
- |
” |
1180 |
1x |
RJ |
RR |
|
|
5.25 |
- |
” |
1182 |
xx |
|
Ref: Puddester but not confirmed |
RR |
|
|
5.26 |
√ 545c. |
- |
” |
1184 |
15 |
HC, RJ |
May be AH 1183 |
RR |
|
5.27 |
- |
” |
11xx |
17 |
|
Ref: Puddester but not confirmed |
RR |
|
|
5.28 |
√ 547. |
- |
” |
1189 |
xx |
RJ |
RR |
|
|
5.29 |
- |
” |
119x |
21 |
|
Ref: Puddester but not confirmed |
RR |
|
|
5.30 |
√ 548c. |
- |
” |
1194 |
xx |
Sachin Arun Gupte, Bald |
RR |
|
|
5.31 |
√ 549. |
- |
” |
1195 |
2x |
Ste, RJ, Noon |
RR |
|
|
5.32 |
√ 550c. |
- |
” |
1197 |
23 |
RJ, Noon but no RY. SA |
|
RR |
|
5.33 |
√ 550. |
292 |
” |
1197 |
24 |
Ste, HC |
|
RR |
|
5.34 |
√ 551. |
- |
” |
1198 |
2x |
Ste |
RR |
|
|
5.35 |
√ 552. |
- |
” |
1199 |
2x |
Ste |
RR |
|
|
5.36 |
√ 553. |
- |
” |
1200 |
26? |
RJ |
RR |
|
|
5.37 |
√ 554. |
- |
” |
1202 |
2x |
HC, RJ |
RR |
|
|
5.38 |
√ 555. |
293 |
” |
1205 |
xx |
RJ |
|
RR |
|
5.39 |
√ 555c. |
” |
1208? |
3x |
HC, Bald |
|
RR |
|
|
5.40 |
√ 557. |
293A |
” |
1211 |
3x |
Ste |
|
RR |
|
5.41 |
294 |
” |
1212 |
xx |
|
|
RR |
|
|
5.42 |
√ 559. |
295 |
” |
1213 |
xx |
Oswal but AH not clear, Zeno |
|
RR |
|
5.43 |
- |
” |
1214 |
xx |
|
Ref: BM. |
RR |
|
|
5.44 |
√ 561c. |
- |
Half Rupee |
1177 |
9 |
RJ |
|
RRR |
|
5.44C |
√ 561e. |
- |
” |
118x |
xx |
Ash |
RRR |
|
|
5.45 |
√ 561. |
296 |
” |
1198 |
2x |
Pr |
Ref: BM |
RRR |
|
5.46 |
297 |
” |
1199 |
2x |
|
|
RRR |
|
|
5.47 |
√ 563. |
298 |
” |
1204 |
3x |
HC, ANS |
RRR |
|
|
5.48 |
√ 564. |
- |
Quarter Rupee |
1176 |
xx |
Ste, RJ |
RR |
|
|
5.49 |
√ 565. |
- |
” |
1189 |
xx |
SA, RJ |
See photos for possible AH 1187? |
RR |
|
5.50 |
√ 565c. |
299 |
” |
1200 |
2x |
ANS |
Ref also: BM |
RR |
|
5.51 |
- |
” |
1202 |
2x |
|
Ref: Lingen. |
RR |
|
|
5.52 |
√ 567. |
- |
” |
xxxx |
3x |
Noon |
RR |
|
|
5.54 |
√ 568c. |
- |
” |
1214 |
xx |
Howard Simmons, HC |
RR |
The previously listed AH 1210/3x quarter rupee, based on Pr. 300, is actually AH 1200 from the ANS shown above

This coin was previously listed as 5.55, a
sixteenth rupee from the Fitzwilliam museum, Cambridge. However, there is
insufficient detail visible to conclude that this is correct.
Sometime before
1792, an attempt was made to introduce silver fanams into the Northern Circars.
Letter to Government from the Masulipatam
Council, dated
We have the honor of
acknowledging the receipt of your letter of the 14th instant, and of
informing you that we do not conceive any part of the present distress to be
owing to want of small currency, as there is a superabundance of copper coin
and a sufficient number of silver quarter rupees in circulation, to answer all
the purposes of small coin. A coinage of fanams and double fanams was formerly
made trial of in this district, but were so often
counterfeited that Government found it necessary to order them to be called in
and suppressed. The coining silver fanams at this time might also, we conceive,
still further depress the value of copper coin, and of course, affect those who
have any quantity of it in their possession…
These coins appear to have been struck firstly in the name of
‘Ālamgīr II (with his regnal years) and then, from 1190, in the name
of Shāh ‘Ālam II (with his regnal years).
|
|
|
|
|
|
sanah
julūs mubārak [AH] (= Auspicious year of accession [AH]) |
ẓarb
bandar machhlīpatan sanah [mubārak] (= struck at the port of Machhlīpatan
in the auspicious year of his reign) |
||
|
Dub |
Half Dub |
|
|
Actual
Weight (g) |
12.53-14.52 |
6.10-6.90 |
|
Actual
Diameter (mm) |
15.7-22.2 |
13.4-18.1 |
|
Composition |
Copper |
|
|
Cat No. |
Photo Link |
Pr. No. |
Denomination
|
AH |
RY |
Provenance |
Comments |
Rarity |
|
RYs
of ‘Ālamgīr II |
||||||||
|
5.56 |
√ 570e. |
301 |
Dub |
1173 |
5 |
RJ |
RR |
|
|
5.57 |
√ 571. |
” |
” |
1174 |
|
Ste, RJ |
|
|
|
5.57C. |
√ 571c. |
” |
” |
1175 |
4 |
Craig |
AH/RY dates mismatched |
|
|
5.57E. |
√ 571e. |
” |
” |
1175 |
8 |
RJ |
|
|
|
5.57G. |
√ 571g. |
” |
” |
1176 |
7 |
RJ |
AH/RY dates mismatched |
|
|
5.58 |
” |
” |
1177 |
|
|
Ref: BM |
|
|
|
5.58C |
√ 572b. |
” |
” |
1178 |
|
RJ |
|
|
|
5.58E |
” |
” |
1179 |
11 |
|
Ref: Steve Album, list 57 (1989),
#1128 (but no photo) |
|
|
|
5.59 |
” |
” |
1180 |
|
|
Ref: Wiggins |
|
|
|
5.59C |
√ 573b. |
” |
” |
1183 |
15 |
RJ |
|
|
|
5.59E |
√ 573e. |
” |
” |
1184 |
16 |
Craig |
|
|
|
5.59H |
√ 573c. |
” |
” |
1186 |
81 |
Craig |
RY 18 retrograde |
|
|
5.60 |
√ 575. |
” |
” |
1187 |
18 |
Ste, Bald |
|
|
|
5.60A |
√ 575c. |
” |
” |
1187 |
19? |
RJ |
|
|
|
5.61 |
√ 574. |
” |
” |
1188 |
19 |
RJ |
Ref: BM |
|
|
5.62 |
√ 574c. |
” |
” |
1189 |
21 |
RJ |
|
|
|
5.63 |
√ 574e. |
” |
” |
1190 |
2x |
RJ |
|
|
|
RYs
of Shāh ‘Ālam II |
||||||||
|
5.63C |
√ 574g. |
” |
” |
1191 |
17 |
RJ, Jay Raiveeson |
|
|
|
5.64 |
√ 576. |
” |
” |
1192 |
18 |
RJ, Jay Raiveeson |
|
|
|
5.64B |
√ 576b. |
” |
” |
1192 |
19 |
Noon |
|
|
|
5.64C |
√ 576a. |
” |
” |
1192 |
20 |
RJ |
|
|
|
5.64D |
√ 576c. |
” |
” |
1193 |
19 |
Craig, RJ, Jay Raiveeson |
|
|
|
5.64E |
√ 576d. |
” |
” |
1194 |
20? |
Jay Raiveeson |
|
|
|
5.64F |
√ 576e. |
” |
” |
1195 |
2x |
RJ |
|
|
|
5.64G |
√ 576g. |
” |
” |
1196 |
22 |
RJ |
|
|
|
5.64J |
√ 576i. |
” |
” |
1197 |
23? |
RJ, Jay Raiveeson |
|
|
|
5.65 |
√ 577. |
” |
” |
1198 |
24 |
Ste, Jay Raiveeson, RJ |
|
|
|
5.66 |
√ 578. |
” |
” |
1199 |
2x |
Vaikunta
Chary R, Noon, Jay Raiveeson |
|
|
|
5.66C |
√ 578c. |
” |
” |
1200 |
27 |
Jay Raiveeson |
|
|
|
5.67 |
√ 579. |
” |
” |
1201 |
27 |
RJ |
|
|
|
5.67A |
√ 579b. |
” |
” |
1201 |
28 |
Noon |
|
|
|
5.68 |
√ 579c. |
” |
” |
1211 |
37 |
RJ |
|
|
|
5.69 |
√ 579e. |
” |
” |
1212 |
3x |
RJ |
|
|
|
5.70 |
√ 580. |
” |
” |
1213 |
39 |
HC, Noon |
|
|
|
5.72 |
√ 581. |
” |
” |
1214 |
40 |
Noon |
|
|
|
5.72C |
√ 579d. |
” |
” |
1215 |
4x |
Jay Raiveeson |
|
|
|
5.73 |
√ 582. |
” |
” |
1217 |
4x |
RJ |
Ref: BM |
|
|
5.74 |
√ 582c. |
” |
” |
1218 |
4x |
RJ |
|
|
|
5.74A |
√ 582d. |
” |
” |
1219 |
45? |
RJ |
RY not clear |
|
|
5.74C |
√ 582e. |
” |
” |
1221 |
47 |
RJ |
|
|
|
5.75 |
√ 583. |
” |
” |
1222 |
47 |
Ste, SA |
|
|
|
RYs
of ‘Ālamgīr II |
||||||||
|
5.76 |
√ 584. |
302 |
Half Dub |
1174 |
5 |
RJ |
|
RR |
|
5.76A |
√ 584b. |
- |
” |
1174 |
7 |
RJ |
|
|
|
5.76B |
√ 584b2. |
- |
” |
1175 |
7 |
RJ |
|
|
|
5.76C |
√ 584b3. |
- |
” |
1176 |
8 |
RJ |
|
|
|
5.76D |
√ 584b6. |
- |
” |
1177 |
8 |
RJ |
|
|
|
5.77 |
√ 584c. |
- |
” |
1186 |
18 |
ANS |
|
|
|
5.77C |
√ 584c3. |
- |
” |
1187 |
19 |
Jay Raiveeson,
RJ |
|
|
|
5.77D |
√ 584c6. |
- |
” |
1188 |
19 |
Jay Raiveeson,
RJ |
|
|
|
RYs
of Shāh ‘Ālam II |
||||||||
|
5.77F |
√ 584c9. |
- |
” |
1190 |
17 |
Jay Raiveeson |
|
|
|
5.77H |
√ 584c11. |
- |
” |
1192 |
xx |
Jay Raiveeson |
|
|
|
5.77J |
√ 584c13. |
- |
” |
1193 |
xx |
Jay Raiveeson |
|
|
|
5.77L |
√ 584c16. |
- |
” |
1195 |
xx |
Jay Raiveeson |
|
|
|
5.77M |
√ 584c18. |
- |
” |
1196 |
22? |
Jay Raiveeson |
RY not clear |
|
|
5.77P |
√ 584c21. |
- |
” |
1198 |
25? |
Craig |
RY not clear |
|
|
5.77R |
- |
” |
1200 |
xx |
|
BM |
|
|
|
5.77T |
√ 584d3. |
- |
” |
1202 |
xx |
RJ |
|
|
|
5.77Y |
√ 584d9. |
- |
” |
1211 |
xx |
RJ |
|
|
|
5.78 |
√ 584e. |
- |
” |
1212 |
3x |
HC |
Most specimens do not show date.
Usually off flan |
|
|
5.78 |
√ 584g. |
- |
” |
xxx2 |
45 |
Noon |
|
|
The coins below have dates in unusual places and are worthy of further
thought and investigation. Bob Johnston wrote the following:
See the following photos of a dub with mint name Machhlīpatan but
with RY 41 on the top of the obverse rather than the normal dot groups.

13.32 gr and 19.7-21.1 mm
See also the photos below of a similar half dub with RY 34 at the top of
the obverse rather than its normal position right of “patan” on the reverse.

6.44 gr and 16.1-18.3 mm
The normal position of the AH date would be off the flan at the bottom
of the obverse on the dub. The few British dubs seen, that show the top of the
obverse, have two dot groups here as on the earlier paisa, including Aurangzeb.
The next photos from Hemanth Chopra are of a similar dub/paisa with RY 6
or 9 at top.

Finally, the last photos, also from Hemanth Chopra are another example
with an undetermined single digit RY, rather than dots at top of the
obverse.

These show there is no AH date at bottom left of the obverse and the RY
6/9 is too early to be an Aurangzeb issue. Unlike these two coins, the RY 34
half dub shows what appears to be the tops of two flat topped numbers or parts
of letters in the position where the AH date normally is. Could these coins
have been minted at another mint such as Gangam, Vizagapatam
and possibly Madapollam, or the Dutch mints at Jaggernaikporam or Bimlapatam
(see Lingen in ONS 161 Supplement pp. 11-12)?
|
|
|
|
|
|
sanah
julūs mubārak [AH] (= Auspicious year of accession [AH]) |
M with Persian inscription: ẓarb bandar machhlīpatan sanah
[RY] [maimanat?] (= struck at the port of Machhlīpatan in the
auspicious year of his reign) RY next to M |
||
|
Dub |
Half Dub |
|
|
Actual
Weight (g) |
13.00-13.72 |
6.04-6.36 |
|
Actual
Diameter (mm) |
17.5-20.6 |
15.3-16.4 |
|
Composition |
Copper |
|
|
Cat No. |
Photo Link |
Pr. No. |
Denomination |
AH |
RY |
Provenance |
Comments |
Rarity |
|
5.79 |
√ 585. |
303 |
Dub |
[xxxx] |
20 |
Ste, RJ |
|
RR |
|
5.80 |
√ 586. |
” |
” |
1218 |
[xx] |
RJ, Lawrence Noronha |
Ref: JNSI (1963) p117, BM.. AH1218 on both sides |
RR |
|
5.81 |
” |
” |
[xxxx] |
28 |
|
M upside-down. Ref: Lingen. No sales
traced. |
RR |
|
|
5.82 |
√ 588. |
- |
Half Dub |
[xxxx] |
25 |
Anon |
Ref: Fitzwilliam museum. No sales
traced |
RRR |
|
5.82C |
√ 588c. |
- |
” |
1xxx |
RJ |
RRR |
|
Mint name not certain but probably poorly written Machhlīpatan
not Vizagapatam |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sikka
mubārak bādshāh ghāzī ‘ālamgīr (= the auspicious coin of the Victorious
Emperor ‘Ālamgīr). |
ẓarb
vizagapatam? sanah [RY] julūs maimanat mānūs (= Struck at Vizagapatam? in the [RY]
year of tranquil prosperity). |
||
|
Actual
Weight (g) |
11.16 |
|
Actual
Diameter (mm) |
? |
|
Composition |
Silver |
|
Edge |
Plain |
|
Cat No. |
Photo Link |
Pr. No. |
AH |
Provenance |
Rarity |
|
|
5.83 |
√ 588m |
- |
1206 |
Bald |
Attribution to Vizagapatam doubtful |
RRR |
No Coins traced. Probably struck with the mint name Machhlipatan