The Letter Copy Books of
the Resident at the Durbar at Murshidabad 1769-1770. Edited by Firminger WK. Calcutta 1919
P62 From
Rajah Hamet Sing and the Naib Jefseraut Cawn have both strongly
urged me to the expediency of having a currency of Arcot rupees in these parts,
which they alledge is necessary not only in the more
important business of the revenues but for the conveniency of trade in general.
The remittances of private merchants have at
all times furnished ample supplies to this province but that source now failing
by reason of a stagnation in our cloth business there seems no other means by
which we can be supplied than a permission from the Durbar to coin Arcots in
our mint; and I am induced by the pressing instances of the officers of the
Collection to join in a request that we may have permission granted us.
Hamet Sing and Jefseraut
Cawn both write at this time to the Nabob Mahomed
Reza Cawn on the subject; and have further to
request, in case there is no objection to coining
Arcots in the Dacca mint, that we may be furnished with a set of stamps for
that purpose from the mint at Moorshedabad.
P100 From the Resident (at the Durbar,
Richard Becher) to
I am favoured with your letter of the 20th
and am sorry I cannot acquiesce in your proposals for coining Arcot rupees in
the Dacca mint; It is very probable this measure might be of service in the
particular district of Dacca, but I am obliged to attend to the general system,
which I think would be much prejudiced by such a privilege being granted – the
good effects from the regulations that has lately taken place to have rupees
exactly the same coined in the four mints would in a great degree be
frustrated; this regulation was after the most mature consideration recommended
by ministers and me to the President & Council as a measure that would tend
much to the general good, and in some degree pave the way for having a standard
fixed rupee – thro’ the provinces; an object the Court of Directors seem to
have much at heart. Thus circumstanced sir, you will perceive the impropriety
there would be for Reza Cawn or me to grant our
sanction to the proposed coinage; indeed it has always been my opinion that
coining Arcot rupees in Bengal was wrong and never should have been practiced –
we do not coin any here except two or three laacs
yearly on the Company’s account for the supply of their Chittagong factory, but
even this is a measure I never approved and would wish to have Arcots and all
foreign rupees on the footing of bullion or merchandize.