Mints of the BaramahalSalem and Krishnagiri

Coins were issued from the mints of Salem and Krishnagiri by:

 

Europeans

British

 

History

These two mints have been discussed by Wiggins [1]. Salem and Krishnagiri are located in a territory called the Baramahal, a tract of land about forty miles inland from Pondicherry. Tipu Sultan of Mysore ceded the Baramahal to the East India Company in 1792, at the conclusion of the third Mysore war.

Owing to the confused monetary systems that were found to exist in the Baramahal [2] [3], it was decided to establish two mints there, in 1793, at Salem and Krishnagiri, with a view to introducing the Company’s coinage. It was proposed to strike several of the Company’s coins at these mints. Gold pagodas were certainly produced but remain unidentified. The coins that have been identified are the common cash pieces and a rare five cash piece. Both bear the name Salem and a date. Emissions from the Krishnagiri mint have not been identified although it would appear that pagodas were issued [4]. The Krishnagiri mint began operations in May 1794 (see end of ref 2) although samples from the Baramahal were sent to the Assay Master at Madras in March 1793 [5] and in May 1793 [6]. Both mints closed in about 1798-99.

Mint/Assay Masters at the Krishnagiri mint: Robert Hughes (finished 18th June 1795) followed by T.B. Hurdis [7]

 

References


[1] Paper read by the late Ken Wiggins on 12 June 1999, at the ONS study day organised at the Department of Coins and Medals, Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge. It was published earlier as ‘Two Unsuccessful Mints of the East India Company’ in The Numismatic Circular, Volume 88, No.10, pp. 349-350.

[2] Madras Consultations, 1794. IOR P/241/48, p2332

Letter to Government from Alexander Read, Collector in the Baramahal,, dated 31st July 1794

In reply to your letters of the 30th May and the 12th instant, I considered the first as an order only, and that like other orders, the attending to it was all Government expected, which is the reason for my not having answered it before. It did however occur that it would be proper, when I might be informed by the Mint Master of the desired lac of new coinage, or of part of it, being in readiness to send to the Presidency; & having no authority to require information of him on matters relating to his department, I concluded that he had instructions to demand of me the various coins received in the collections, to recoin, and to return me the proceeds or forward them himself to the treasury, of which I imagined he would give intimation, when I could inform your government particularly on the subject. Understanding from your second letter more fully what was expected of me, I immediately on receipt of it addressed the Mint Master at Krishnagiri requesting to be informed as to the profit or expense of it. This answer containing all the information he is yet able to give on those matters, I transmit it herewith on that account; and have to add , in respect to what has depended on myself, in complying with your letters on remittance, that since receipt of the first I have remitted 70,000 pagodas through sources, and the house of Call, Baker & Co, on all of which (excepting the portion of it which consisted of star pagodas) the Company receive a premium of 1 ½ per cent; but the bills being payable at 50 days sight, the greatest part of it will not be received into the treasury till the end of next month.

You will please to inform the Honble Governor that all the revenue of the last year being collected and none of the current year falling due till December except the monthly kists of the customs, which are inconsiderable, it is necessary to reserve the balance actually in hand, which (as appears by the accompanying estimate, will be about a lac at the end of this month) for the ordinary advances to public departments; and that should any more of it be recoined before January, it will be necessary on the same account to keep it in these districts.

By the statement accompanying the letter from the Mint Master, it appears that the loss sustained by the recoinage of the several coins received in the collections, is from 2 to 5 ¼ percent, consequently that it is much better to remit the residue on the terms I have hitherto procured. That may however be a subject of future consideration when I may take occasion to address Government or the Revenue Board upon it.

There then follows a paper showing the loss on coining Cantaray or Sultany pagodas, and Bahaudry or Salanny pagodas.

There is then a long letter from the Mint Master (Robert Hughes) in which he stated:

…Under date the 5th May last I had the pleasure of giving you notification of the commencement of our coinage…

[3] Madras Consultations, 1794. IOR P/241/48, p2367

Letter to Captain Alexander Read, Collector in the Baramahal, from Government, dated 9th August 1794

I am directed by the Honble the President in Council to acknowledge the receipt of your letter dated 31st ultimo and, as you do not appear to comprehend the full extent of his wish in establishing the mint at Krishnagiri he desires me to inform you that he has resolved to introduce the Carnatic coins entirely, and to abolish the numerous coins which were found circulating in the ceded countries when they were taken possession of for the Company. With this view the President in Council directs that all money not the currency of the Carnatic, which shall be received into your treasuries, may be tendered to the Assay Master for recoinage as fast as the work can be executed.

The President in Council leaves it to your discretion to retain such part of the balance in your hands, after it shall be recoined, as shall be sufficient to supply the demands of the Public Department.

[4] Madras District Gazetteer, Salem. Madras 1918, vol. 1, part 1, p292.

Letter from Government to Board of Revenue No. 182, dated 20th March 1796

There were three coinages of pagodas at Krishnagiri. The first issue numbered only 6,788, the second (which contained an excess of pure gold of the weight of 2 ragi grains) numbered 17,173 and the third (which had an excess of 1 ½ paddy grains above the Madras standard) numbered 14,875

[5] Madras Consultations, 1793. IOR p/241/38, p1277

Letter from Government to the Madras Assay Master (Benjamin Roebuck), dated March 1793

I am directed by the Honble the Governor in Council to send you five pagodas coined by Captain Alexander Read in the Baramahal country, and to desire you will report, with as little delay as possible, whether they are equal to the star pagodas coined in the Madras mint.

[6] Madras Consultations, 1793. IOR p/241/39, p1943

Letter from Government to the Madras Assay Master (Benjamin Roebuck), dated May 1793

You will be pleased to receive two hundred star pagodas coined in the Baramahal

[7] Madras Consultations, 1795 . IOR, P/241/57, p2977

Letter from Robert Hughes to Government, dated 19th June 1795.

I do myself the honor of reporting to you for the present, my having delivered over to Mr Hurdis the assaymastership of this mint pursuant to your directions, and whole receipts for the balance of cash etc. I have also the pleasure of enclosing herein, duplicates of which, together with this lists it specifies have been forwarded to the Assay Master at this Presidency.

Letter from T.B. Hurdis to Government, dated 18th June 1795.

I do hereby acknowledge to have this day received from Mr Robert Hughes late assay master to the mint at Kishnaghery the charges of that employ, the correspondence and several article belonging thereunto as per separate lists, together with the accounts complete, and balance of cash remaining on 31st May last, Viz: Star pagodas (62.1.63) sixty two, one fanam and sixty three cash.