|
|
|
|
Photo from Baldwin, Autumn Argentum Auction 2016, lot
402, where the following comment was made: The date on this coin cannot be 1067 as
Aurangzeb did not become emperor until 1068; even if it is meant to read 1068
this would still be unlikely. The most likely explanation is that the
die-engraver started to put 1069, then changed it to 1070 without removing
the 6, thus leaving a date of 10670. |
|
