View/Print
.pdf
Azim Shah
Shailen Bhandare wrote: Azeem ush-Shan was the second son of
Shah Alam Bahadur and was a favourite
to succeed his father among his other sons,namely
Jahandar Shah (the eldest), Rafi ush-Shan (the
third) and Jahan Shah (the youngest). When Shah Alam Bahadur died at Lahore on 20 Muharram AH1124
(27th February 1712), his other sons made a combine against Azeem ush-Shan
under a plot hatched by Zulfiqar Khan, who supported Jahandar Shah as the contender. The armies of the combine met with
that of Azeem ush-Shan on the banks of the River
Ravi on 7 Safar AH1124 (15th March 1712) and a bloody battle was fought for
three days during which Azeem ush-Shan was killed when he was drowned in the
river. The combine of his three brothers was thus successful,
but fighting soon erupted among them leading to the elimination of
Rafi ush-Shan and Jahan Shah. Jahandar Shah succeeded to the throne with Zulfiqar Khan's support
and in return he was made the Wazeer. Coins in the name of Azeem ush-Shan
were, however, struck for a very brief time, in faraway provinces of Bengal,
Bihar and Orissa. The culprit behind their issue was Farrukhsiyar,
the son of Azeemush-Shan, and the Governor of these
provinces. He received the news of Shah Alam
Bahadur's death on 7 Safar AH1124 (15th March 1712) when he was near Patna.
On 13 Safar 1124 (21st March 1712), unaware that Azeem ush-Shan had already
been killed, Farrukhsiyar proclaimed him the
emperor and struck coins in his name. The news of Azeemush-Shan's
death ultimately reached him on 29 Safar. Thereafter he decided to crown
himself and pose as a challenge to Jahandar Shah.
His ambitions were finally realized on 19th January 1713, when he was
proclaimed the Emperor at Dehli after defeating
Jahandar Shah at Agra with the help of his trusted
ministers, the Sayyad Brothers. The issue of coins in the name of Azeemush-Shan thus presents a very interesting story of
intrigue, victory and defeat in the Mughal court.
They were struck for a very short spell – a little more than sixteen days!
They constitute perhaps the rarest of an instance of a name of a transient
'emperor' to have appeared on Mughal coins. |