Reference address for this file -
http://www.psindiancoins.com/unzipped/Moghul/Farrukhsiyar/AllLahore.htm
Moghul
Empire – Farrukh Siyar – Lāhore (dār
al-sulṭānat) Mint, Gold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Actual
Weight (g) |
|
|
Actual
Diameter (mm) |
|
Composition |
Gold |
Catalogue
|
Cat No. |
Photo Link |
KM |
Denomination |
AH |
RY |
Provenance |
Comments |
Rarity |
|
FS |
390.20 |
Mohur |
1127 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
FS |
√ 5861c. |
” |
1128 |
5 |
Bald |
|
|
|
|
FS |
|
” |
1129 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
FS |
√ 5861g. |
|
” |
1130 |
7 |
Bhandare |
'Shah' and
'Fazl' as dividers.on
obverse |
|
|
FS |
|
” |
1131 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
FS |
|
” |
1131 |
8 |
|
|
|
Moghul
Empire – Farrukh Siyar – Lāhore Mint, Silver
|
|
Photo from Zeno database.
Posted by hmk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Rupee |
Half Rupee |
|
Actual
Weight (g) |
|
|
|
Actual
Diameter (mm) |
|
|
|
Composition |
Silver |
|
Catalogue
|
Cat No. |
Photo Link |
KM |
Denomination |
AH |
RY |
Provenance |
Comments |
Rarity |
|
FS |
√ 5864. |
377.43 |
Rupee |
1125 |
1 |
Ste |
|
C |
|
FS |
√ 5864c. |
|
” |
1125 |
2 |
Ste |
|
|
|
FS |
|
” |
1126 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
FS |
√ 5865. |
|
” |
1126 |
3 |
Ste |
See Zeno database |
|
|
FS |
|
” |
1127 |
3 |
|
|
||
|
FS |
√ 5866. |
|
” |
1127 |
4 |
Ste |
|
|
|
FS |
|
” |
1128 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
FS |
√ 5867. |
|
” |
1128 |
5 |
Ste |
|
|
|
FS |
|
” |
1129 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
FS |
|
” |
1129 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
FS |
√ 5869. |
|
” |
1130 |
6 |
Ste |
|
|
|
FS |
√ 5869c. |
|
” |
1130 |
7 |
Ste |
|
|
|
FS |
|
” |
1131 |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
FS |
|
” |
1131 |
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
FS |
375.8 |
Half
Rupee |
xxxx |
6 |
|
|
RR |

Photo from Bhandare. 1129/5. Ruler’s name at top

Photo from Bhandare. Ruler’s name in middle

1129/6. Photo from Victor Newey

Photo from Adv Shailesh P Jain. NB different marks
Moghul
Empire – Farrukh Siyar – Lāhore Mint, Silver
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Actual
Weight (g) |
|
|
Actual
Diameter (mm) |
|
Composition |
Silver |
Catalogue
|
Cat No. |
Photo Link |
KM |
Denomination |
AH |
RY |
Provenance |
Comments |
Rarity |
|
FS |
378.1 |
Legal
Dirham |
1129 |
6 |
|
|
RRR |

Photo from
Bhandare. Lahore - a "Dirham Shara'ee" or 'Legal Dirham', struck in the reign of Farrukhsiyar, AH1129/RY6, 3.09 gm.
(ANS, New York)
Under Islamic Law, the Jizya جزية
is a per capita tax levied on a section of the non-Muslim subjects of an
Islamic state. The tax is to be levied on able-bodied adult males of military
age (but with specific exemptions). Jizya was a material proof of the
non-Muslims' acceptance of subjection to the state and its laws. In return,
non-Muslim subjects are permitted to practice their faith, to enjoy a measure
of communal autonomy, to be entitled to the Muslim state's protection from
outside aggression, and to be exempted from military servuce
and from the ‘Zakat’ tax levied upon Muslim citizens.
The Arabic term jizya appears in 29th verse of the 9th
Chapter named ‘al-Tawbah’ or “repentance” (Qura’an
9:29) –
“Fight those who do not believe in Allah
or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah
and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth
from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah
willingly while they are humbled.”
Persons who paid the tax were divided into three classes –
the Poor, the Middle Classes and the Rich. The rates were 12, 24 and 48 Dirhams
respectively. But as there was no Dirham current in India, un-coined silver was
to be taken – from the first class (the Poors) 3 Tolchas 1 4/5 Masha, double that from the next class and
four times that from the Rich. If Rupees were collected
they were received in equal weights to the corresponding amount of silver
specified. Collection was made from the Rich in four instalments per year, from
the Middle Classes in two and from the Poor once a year. There were a range of
exemptions and amendments prescribed for various situations.
Special coins called ‘Dirham Shara’ee’
were struck to alleviate this complication brought about by the non-prevalence
of the Dirham in India. As this coin weighs around 3 gm, it is roughly equal to
about 3 Annas 8 pies. Going by the prescribed amounts, the tax for the Poor
will be 2 Rupees 12 Annas, for the Middle Classes 5 Rupees 8 Annas and for the
Rich 11 Rupees per annuum. This amount is actually lesser
than the amount they would pay if they paid the tax as un-coined silver.
The tax was abolished by Akbar but revived by Aurangzeb in
his 22nd RY, AH1090 (12 April 1679). It was again abolished by Farrukhsiyar in his first RY. However, in his 6th RY he was
forced to revive it under the influence of Inayat-ullah
Khan, the former ‘Diwan-i-Khalisa’ and a powerful courtier. He had served under
Aurangzeb and emulated him as an ideal ruler. He was a hardliner and had
earlier been sent off on a pilgrimage to Mecca for his insouciance. Upon his
return he managed to gain a re-entry in Farrukhsiyar’s
court to his old office as well as being appointed the governor of Kashmir. His
re-emergence was facilitated to serve as a check for the ambitions of the
Sayyid Brothers, particularly Qutb ul-Mulk.
The re-introduction of the Jizya was not at all a popular
move, particularly for Hindu heavyweights of the court like Maharaja Sawai
Jaisingh. But in a letter dated 3 April 1717 to Jai Singh, Farrukhsiyar
lamented on his own weakness against the power of Inayat-ullah
and his inability to go against his minister’s decision to impose the Jizya.
Farrukhsiyar was finally eliminated by the
Sayyid brothers, who after various machinations met their own nemesis at the
hands of Muhammad Shah. At
the beginning of Muhammad Shah’s reign, the Jizya was
abolished. But it did make a brief and final reappearance in 1725 before
sinking into History’s oblivion.