View/Print .pdf

Nagpur – Raghuji I (1730-1755), Chanda (written Surat) Mint – INO Muhammad Shah – Silver

	Script from Kulkarni
sikka mubārak bādshāh ghazi muḥammad shah		ẓarb surat sanah [RY] julūs maimanat mānūs

Actual Weight (g)

11.1

Actual Diameter (mm)

23-24

Composition

Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 10	9001.	1.1	Rupee		27			RRR
NG 11	9002.	1.2	”		47		Retrograde 4	RRR
NG 12	√ 9003.	1.3	”		47	Ste. Only part of RY visible		RRR

Nagpur – Raghuji I (1730-1755), Cuttack Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Silver – Type 1

Photos from Kulkarni	Script from Kulkarni
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Ahmad Shah Bahadur		Zarb Cuttack sanah [RY] julus maimanat manus

Actual Weight (g)	11.53-11.7
Actual Diameter (mm)	21.5-22
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Obv	Rev	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
-		2.1	Rupee	A	I	116x	2		RY 2 may have been struck by the Nawab of Bengal and is recorded there.	Unique?
NG 15	9005.	2.2	”	B	II		5			Unique?

Obverse Varieties

The differentiating marks on the obverse vary (drawings from Kulkarni)

	None
A	B

Reverse Varieties

The differentiating marks on the reverse vary (drawings from Kulkarni)

I	II

Nagpur – Raghuji I (1730-1755), Cuttack Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Silver – Type 2

A new date reported for a well-known Bhonsla rupee

Many of us have been using Prashant Kulkarni’s excellent book about the coinage of the Bhonsla Rajas of Nagpur for more years than we would care to admit. Although it is now a fairly old publication, there have been relatively few additional or “new” varieties reported.

One series that has puzzled me for some time is TYPE 4, Nagpur mint with mint-name “Cuttack”. Readers will be aware that this is reported in Prashant’s book as being available with regnal years 1 (ahd), 4, 5, and two varieties of 7. Perhaps all the missing years are out there waiting to be discovered and reported. I have recently been able to obtain a coin of type 4 with the regnal year 6 clearly displayed (albeit, very close to the edge of the flan).

It has the same distinguishing marks as Prashant’s illustrations of Varieties 4.1, 4.2 and 4.3 (i.e. the ones with regnal years ahd, 4 and 5. It weighs a pretty standard 11.4g approx., and displays the usual array of coutermarks, viz. A hollow circle, a hollow square, an “alpha”-shaped mark, and four dots arranged in a square. These are all on the faces, both obverse and reverse. There are also at least eight countermarks round the edge.

May we be told if any other so-far unreported dates have surfaced, please?

B J Tabor

	Script from Kulkarni
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Ahmad Shah Bahadur		Zarb Cuttack sanah [RY] maimanat manus

Actual Weight (g)	11.07-11.15
Actual Diameter (mm)	22-24
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	KM	Denomination	AH	RY	Rev	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 18	√ 9006.	4.1		Rupee		1	I	Ste		S
NG 19	9007.	4.2		”		3	I?
NG 20	√ 9007c.	-	446.29	”		4	I	Ste		R
NG 21	√ 9008.	4.3		”		5	I	Ste		S
NG 22	√ 9008c.	-		”		6	I	Ste	See Barry Tabor’s note above	R
NG 23	√ 9009.	4.4		”		7	II	Ste		S
NG 24	9010.	4.5		”		7	III			S
NG 25	√ 9010c.	-		”		8	I	Ste		R

Reverse Varieties

The differentiating marks on the reverse vary (drawings from Kulkarni)

I	II	III

Nagpur – Raghuji I (1730-1755), Nagpur (written Surat) Mint – INO Muhammad Shah – Silver

Two more unreported regnal years on rupees of the Bhonsle Rajas of Nagpur.

In the ICS Newsletter number 32, I published as a recent find, a rupee of the Bhonslas struck at Nagpur, with the mint-name “Cuttack”, Kulkarni type 4, which has the regnal year 6. Mr Kulkarni allotted the number 4.3.1 to it. I was somewhat surprised to discover another two unreported dates on two of my very modest collection of Bhonsle rupees. These are both type 3 coins with the mint-name “Surat”. Mr Kulkarni confirms that neither of these date-varieties have been reported to him.

These coins were struck during the reign of Raghuji the first (1730-1755AD) at the Nagpur mint. Raghuji's mint masters did not use their own design but copied the inscription from the rupees of the Mughal emperor, Mohammad Shah (1719-1748AD) struck at the Surat mint. They added a few mint marks here and there to make the coins look better, but did not bother to replace the mint-name for the place at which they were actually struck. The regnal year range is from year 6 to 24, and the AH date is rarely present in full.

The first is similar to Mr Kulkarni’s illustration of K.3.1, but with a slightly different arrangement of dot-clusters, and with an eight-pointed star in the second line of the obverse face. Unfortunately the third and fourth digits of the AH date are off the flan, but the regnal year is unmistakably, and very clearly, a “9”. This is a new year for this type, and this variety has been allocated the deignation 3.2.3 by Mr Kulkarni.

The second coin is very like K.3.6 and 3.7 (especially 3.6) , but with the year showing as “22”. It may be a little unclear in the accompanying photograph, but careful examination of the actual coin shows that the second “2” ends cleanly a fraction of a millimetre from the edge of the flan, and is definitely not an incomplete three. The only digit of the AH date visible on the flan is the initial “1”, which is not very helpful. This variety has been allocated the new number 3.7.1

Can anyone else help to fill the remaining gaps in the type 3 and type 4 series?

Barrytabor@aol.com

	Script from Kulkarni
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Muhammad Shah		Zarb Surat sanah [RY] julus maimanat manus. NB No extra marks as seen on coins of the Chanda mint.

Actual Weight (g)	10.89-11.1
Actual Diameter (mm)	20-25
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Obv	Rev	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 28	√ 9011.	-	Rupee				2	Ste		R
NG 29	9011c.	3.1	”	A	I	1133	6			R
NG 30	9012.	3.2	”	A	II		6			R
NG 31	√ 9012c.		”				9	Ste	See Barry Tabor’s comments above.
NG 32	√ 9012e.		”				10	Ste
NG 33	√ 9013.	3.3	”	B	III		13	Ste		C
NG 34	√ 9014.	3.4	”	C	IV		13	Ste		RRR
NG 35	√ 9014c.		”				15	Ste		RRR
NG 36	9015.	3.5	”	D	V		19			C
NG 37	√ 9016.	3.6	”	E	VI		19	Ste		R
NG 38	9017.	3.7	”	F	VII		20			C
NG 39	√ 9017c.		”				22	Ste	See Barry Tabor’s comments above
NG 40	√ 9018.	3.8	”	G	VIII		23	Ste		C
NG 41	√ 9019.	3.9	”	G	IX		24	Ste		C
NG 42	√ 9020.	3.10	”	H	X	1156	26	Ste		R

Obverse Varieties

The differentiating marks on the obverse vary (drawings from Kulkarni)

None
A	B	C	D	E

F	G	H

Reverse Varieties

The differentiating marks on the reverse vary (drawings from Kulkarni)

I	II	III	IV	V

		None?
VI	VII	VIII	IX	X

Nagpur – Janoji (1755-1772), Amravati Mint – INO Shah Ali Gauhar – Copper – Type 1

Called the do-dundi anna. Distinguished from next type by 4 dots in seen of julus on reverse

Photos from Kulkarni	Script from Kulkarni
Shah Ali Gauhar		Sanah [RY] julus maimanat manus

Actual Weight (g)

48.5

Actual Diameter (mm)

28

Composition

Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 45	9022.	6.1	Anna (4 Pice)	None			Unique

Nagpur – Janoji (1755-1772), Amravati Mint – INO Shah Jahan III – Copper – Type 2

Photos & Scripts from Kulkarni
Crude legend (= Shah Jahan Badshah Ghazi)	Jumbled legend (= manus maimanat julus)

Actual Weight (g)	~48
Actual Diameter (mm)	25
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 48	9023.	7.1	Anna (4 Paisa)	None			Unique

Nagpur – Janoji (1755-1772), Amravati Mint – INO Shah Ali Gauhar – Copper – Type 3

This coin was called the do-dundi paisa

Photos from Kulkarni	Scripts from Kulkarni
Shah Ali Gauhar Badshah Ghazi		sanah [Ry] julus maimanat manus

Actual Weight (g)	13.45
Actual Diameter (mm)	20
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 50	9021.	5.1	Paisa	None			RR

Nagpur – Janoji (1755-1772), Amravati Mint – INO Shah Jahan III – Copper – Type 4

Also called do-dundi paisa

Crude legend (= shāh jahān bādshāh ghazi)	Jumbled legend (= manūs maimanat julūs)

Actual Weight (g)	20.01-20.02
Actual Diameter (mm)	22-24
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Obv	Rev	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 53	√ 9024.	8.1	Paisa	A	I	None	Ste, Zeno		C
NG 54	9025.	8.2	”	B	II	None			C

Obverse Varieties

The differentiating marks on the obverse vary (drawings from Kulkarni)

	None
A	B

Reverse Varieties

The differentiating marks on the reverse vary (drawings from Kulkarni)

I	II

Nagpur – Janoji (1755-1772), Chanda (written as Surat) Mint – INO Muhammad Shah – Silver

	Script from Kulkarni
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Muhammad Shah		Zarb Surat sanah [Ry] julus maimanat manus

Actual Weight (g)	10.96
Actual Diameter (mm)	21.5
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 57	√ 9026.	9.1	Rupee	11xx	27	Ste		R

Nagpur – Janoji (1755-1772), Cuttack Mint – INO ′Ālamgīr II – Silver – Type 1

Photos & scripts from Kulkarni
(=Alamgir Badshah ghazi sikka mubarak)	(= Manus maimanat sanah julus zarb Cuttack)

Actual Weight (g)	11.5
Actual Diameter (mm)	23
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	KM	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 59	9028.	-	460.44	Rupee	xxxx	6
NG 60	9028c.	10.1	-	”	xxxx	7			RRR

Nagpur – Janoji (1755-1772), Cuttack Mint – INO Shah ′Ālam II – Silver – Type 2

	Script from Kulkarni
sikka zad bar haft kishwar sāya fazl-i-ilāh Hami al-din Muhammad Shah ′Ālam bādshāh		ẓarb Cuttack sanah [Ry] julūs maimanat mānūs

Actual Weight (g)
Actual Diameter (mm)
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 61	9027.	12	Rupee	xxxx	3			Unique

Nagpur – Janoji (1755-1772), Cuttack Mint – INO Shah Alam II – Silver – Type 3

Photos & scripts from Kulkarni
(= Sikka zad bar haft kishwar sayah fazl-i-ilah Hami ud-din Muhammad Shah Alam badshah)		(= Manus maimanat sanah julus zarb Cuttack)

Actual Weight (g)	2.6
Actual Diameter (mm)	15
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 62	9029.	11.1	Quarter Rupee	xxxx	2			Unique

Nagpur – Janoji (1755-1772), Garhakota Mint – INO Ahmed Shah – Silver

sikka mubārak bādshāh ghazi aḥmad shāh bahādur		ẓarb garhakota sanah [RY] maimanat mānūs

Actual Weight (g)	10.8-10.9
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 64	9030.	13.1	Rupee	xxxx	56			RR
NG 65	√ 9031.	13.2	Rupee	xxxx	56	ClassNG		RR

Nagpur – Janoji (1755-1772), Nagpur (written as Cuttack) Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Silver

	Script from Kulkarni
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Ahmad Shah Bahadur		Zarb Cuttack sanah [Ry] julus maimanat manus

Actual Weight (g)	10.9-11.02
Actual Diameter (mm)	20-22
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 67	9032.	14.1	Rupee		14			R
NG68	9033.	14.2	”		211			R
NG 69	√ 9034.	14.3	”		312	Ste		R
NG 70	9035.	14.4	”		48			R
NG 71	√ 9036.	14.5	”		57	Ste		S
NG 72	√ 9036c.	-	”		74	Ste		S
NG 73	√ 9036e.	-	”		118	Ste		S

Nagpur – Janoji (1755-1772), Uncertain (written as Cuttack) Mint – INO Ahmed Shah – Silver

	Script from Kulkarni
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Ahmad Shah Bahadur		Zarb Cuttack sanah [RY] julus maimanat manus

Actual Weight (g)	11.15
Actual Diameter (mm)	20
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Rev	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 75	9037.	15.1	Rupee	I		1			S
NG 76	9038.	15.2	”	I		8			S
NG 77	√ 9039.	15.3	”	I		11	Ste	Flag to right of RY	S
NG 78	9040.	15.4	”	I		11			S
NG 79	9041.	15.5	”	I		12			S
NG 80	9042.	15.6	”	I	11[60]	xx			S
NG 81	√ 9043.	15.7	”	I	[11]69	xx	Ste		S
NG 82	9044.	15.8	”	I	1170	xx		Date retrograde	R
NG 83	√ 9045.	15.9	”	I	[11]74	xx	Ste	One seems to be RY 84. See photos.	S
NG 84	9046.	15.10	”	I	[11]76	xx			S
NG 85	√ 9047.	15.11	”	II	[11]77	xx	Ste	One looks like 1178. See photos.	RR
NG 86	9048.	15.12	”	II	1180	xx			RR
NG 87	9049.	15.13	”	II	1180	xx		Date retrograde	RR
NG 88	9050.	15.14	”	II	1182	xx		Date retrograde	R

Reverse Varieties

The differentiating marks on the reverse vary (drawings from Kulkarni)

I	II

Nagpur – Raghuji II (1772-1816), Chanda (written Surat) Mint – INO Muhammad Shah – Silver

Same type also issued under Parsoji II, Appa Saheb and Raghuji III and cannot be distinguished separately.

Note the symbols on the reverse just above the mint name

	scripts from Kulkarni
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Muhammad Shah		Zarb Surat sanah [RY] julus maimanat manus

	Rupee	Half Rupee	Quarter Rupee
Actual Weight (g)	10.68-10.8	5.4	2.6
Actual Diameter (mm)	21	17	14
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 90	√ 9051.	18.1	Rupee	11xx	27	Ste		C
NG 91	9052.	18.2	”		27		Extra mark on reverse	S
NG 92	9053.	17.1	Half Rupee		[27]			RRR
NG 93	9054.	16.1	Quarter Rupee		27			Unique

Nagpur – Raghuji II (1772-1816), Cuttack Mint – INO Shah Alam II – Silver

Photos & scripts from Kulkarni
Sikka zad bar haft kishwar sayah fazl-i-ilah Hami ud-din Muhammad Shah Alam badshah (= Defender of the religion of Muhammad, Shah Alam Emperor Shadow of the divine favour, put his stamp on the seven climes)		Zarb Cuttack sanah [RY] julus maimanat manus

Actual Weight (g)	11.40-11.41
Actual Diameter (mm)	22-26
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 95	9055.	19.1	Rupee		15			RRR
NG 96	9056.	19.2	”		22		Octagonal	Unique
NG 97	9057.	19.3	”		22		Square	RRR
NG 98	9058.	19.4	”		22		Round (Numismatic Supplement XIII No. 12 p238)	RRR

• Photo from Sachin Arun Gupte

Shailen Bhandare

3 June 10:46

I have a record of RYs 3, 6, 12 and 14. The '3' could well be 30, but the others are clear in the detail. I recall RY6 appeared in a Todywalla Auction.

Nagpur – Raghuji II (1772-1816), Jabalpur Mint (written as Cuttack) – INO Ahmad Shah – Silver

Also issued under later rulers but not possible to distinguish between them.

sikka zad bar haft kishwar sayah fazl-i-ilāh hāmī al-dīn muḥammad shāh ālam bādshāh (= Defender of the religion of Muḥammad, Shāh Ālam Emperor Shadow of the divine favour, put his stamp on the seven climes)		ẓarb cuttack sanah [Ry] julūs maimanat manūs

	Rupee	Half Rupee
Actual Weight (g)	10.8	5.5
Actual Diameter (mm)	19-20	17
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 100	√ 9059.	22.1	Rupee		51	Ste		S
NG 101	9060.	21.1	Half Rupee		51			RR

Nagpur – Raghuji II (1772-1816), Jabalpur Mint (written as Cuttack) – INO Ahmad Shah – Copper

Also issued under later rulers but not possible to distinguish between them.

Photos & scripts from Kulkarni
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Ahmad Shah bahadur		Zarb Cuttack sanah [RY] julus maimanat manus

Actual Weight (g)	14-16
Actual Diameter (mm)	21
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Obv	Rev	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 103	9061.	20.1	Pice	A	I		51			S
NG 104	9062.	20.2	”	B	I		51		Persian numeral 6 to left of julus	S
NG 105	9063.	20.3	”	C	I		51			S
NG 106	9064.	20.4	”	D	I		51			S
NG 107	9065.	20.5	”	E	I		51			S
NG 108	√ 9066.	20.6	”	F	II		51	Ste		S

Obverse Varieties

The differentiating marks on the obverse vary (drawings from Kulkarni)

A	B	C	D	E	F

Reverse Varieties

The differentiating marks on the reverse vary (drawings from Kulkarni)

None
I	II

Nagpur – Raghuji II (1772-1816), Nagpur Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Gold

Also issued under later rulers but not possible to distinguish between them.

Actual Weight (g)
Actual Diameter (mm)
Composition	Gold

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 110	9067.	-	Mohur				See Kulkarni p149	RRR

Nagpur – Raghuji II (1772-1816), Nagpur Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Silver – Type 1

Also issued under later rulers but not possible to distinguish between them.

Sikka mubārak bādshāh ghazi aḥmad shah bahadur		ẓarb cuttack sanah [RY] julūs maimanat mānūs.

	Rupee	Quarter Rupee
Actual Weight (g)	10.25-11.0	2.60-2.65
Actual Diameter (mm)	20-21	14
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 112	√ 9068.	29.1	Rupee		512		No dot to left of julūs on reverse	C
NG 113	√ 9069.	29.2	”		512	Ste	Dot to left of julūs on reverse. Two dots on mine	C
NG 114	9070.	29.3	”		521		Dot to left of julūs on reverse	C
NG 115	9071.	28.1	Quarter Rupee				Not sure of the difference between these two	RR
NG 116	9072.	28.2	”		5x			RR

Nagpur – Raghuji II (1772-1816), Nagpur Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Silver – Type 2

Also issued under later rulers but not possible to distinguish between them.

	scripts from Kulkarni
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Ahmad Shah Bahadur		Zarb Cuttack sanah [Ry] julus maimanat manus Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	10.6
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 118	√ 9073.	30.1	Rupee		5	Ste		R

Nagpur – Raghuji II (1772-1816), Nagpur Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Silver – Type 3

Also issued under later rulers but not possible to distinguish between them.

	scripts from Kulkarni
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Ahmad Shah Bahadur		Zarb Cuttack sanah [RY] julus maimanat manus. Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	10.75
Actual Diameter (mm)	19-20
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 120	√ 9074.	31.1	Rupee		5	Ste		RR

Nagpur – Raghuji II (1772-1816), Nagpur Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Silver – Type 4

Also issued under later rules but not possible to distinguish between them.

Photos & scripts from Kulkarni
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Ahmad Shah Bahadur		Zarb Cuttack sanah [RY] julus maimanat manus. Differentiating mark of a flower:

Actual Weight (g)	10.6
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 122	9075.	32.1	Rupee		51x			RRR

Nagpur – Raghuji II (1772-1816), Nagpur Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Silver – Type 5

Also issued under later rulers but not possible to distinguish between them.

Photos & scripts from Kulkarni
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Ahmad shah Bahadur		ẓarb Cuttack sanah [RY] julūs maimanat mānūs Differentiating mark of two parallel lines:

Actual Weight (g)	11.65
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 124	√ 9076.	33.1	Rupee		5	Ste		R

Nagpur – Raghuji II (1772-1816), Nagpur Mint (written as Cuttack) – INO Ahmad Shah – Copper – Type 1

Also issued under later rulers but not possible to distinguish between them.

	scripts from Kulkarni
Ahmad Shah badshah		[RY] julus manus

Actual Weight (g)	16.4-16.85
Actual Diameter (mm)	21-22
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Obv	Rev	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 126	√ 9077.	23.1	Pice	A	I	None	Ste but too worn to tell obv variety		S
NG 127	9078.	23.2	”	B	II	None			S
NG 128	9079.	23.3	”	B	III	None			S
NG 129	9080.	23.4	”	C	II	None			S

Nagpur – Raghuji II (1772-1816), Nagpur Mint (written as Cuttack) – INO Ahmad Shah – Copper – Type 2

Also issued under later rulers but not possible to distinguish between them.

Drawings from Kulkarni
A Persian legend but reading uncertain Differentiating mark:	A Persian legend but reading uncertain Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	16.8
Actual Diameter (mm)	19-20
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 130	9081.	24.1	Pice	None			S

Nagpur – Raghuji II (1772-1816), Nagpur Mint (written as Cuttack) – INO Ahmad Shah – Copper – Type 3

Also issued under later rulers but not possible to distinguish between them.

Photos etc from Kulkarni
aḥmad shāh bādshāh		nagpur julūs. Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	16.8
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 131	9082.	25.1	Pice	None			R

Nagpur – Raghuji II (1772-1816), Nagpur Mint (written as Cuttack) – INO Ahmad Shah – Copper – Type 4

Also issued under later rulers but not possible to distinguish between them.

Photos etc from Kulkarni
aḥmad shāh bādshāh. Differentiating mark:		julūs manūs Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	14.6 (cut specimen)
Actual Diameter (mm)	23
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 132	9083.	26.1	Pice	None			S

Nagpur – Raghuji II (1772-1816), Nagpur Mint (written as Cuttack) – INO Ahmad Shah – Copper – Type 5

Also issued under later rulers but not possible to distinguish between them.

Photos etc from Kulkarni
Ahmad Shah badshah		[RY] julus manus Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	15.1
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 133	9084.	27.1	Pice	None		Milled edge	S

Nagpur – Raghuji II (1772-1816), Uncertain Mint (written as Cuttack) – INO Ahmad Shah? – Silver

Also issued under later rulers but not possible to distinguish between them.

Photos etc from Kulkarni
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Ahmad Shah Bahadur		Zarb Cuttack sanah [RY] julus maimanat manus Differentiating mark in seen:

Actual Weight (g)	11.2
Actual Diameter (mm)	22
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 135	9085.	35.1	Rupee	1188			11 above and 88 below sanah	R
NG 136	9086.	35.2	”	1188			1188 written in one line	S

Nagpur – Parsoji II (1816-17), Nagpur Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Copper – Type 1

Ahmad Shah badshah		Nagpur julus Differentiating mark of a trisul:

Actual Weight (g)	11.8-12.5
Actual Diameter (mm)	18
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 137	√ 9087.	36.1	Pice	None	Ste	Round	C
NG 138	√ 9088.	36.2	”	None	Ste	Rectangular	S

Nagpur – Parsoji II (1816-17), Nagpur Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Copper – Type 2

Photos etc from Kulkarni
Ahmad Shah badshah		Nagpur Julus Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	12.4
Actual Diameter (mm)	17
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 139	9089.	37.1	Pice	None		NB reduced weight. Milled edge	S

Nagpur – Parsoji II (1816-17), Nagpur Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Copper – Type 3

Photos etc from Kulkarni
Ahmad Shah badshah		Julus. Differentiating mark of a fish:

Actual Weight (g)	11.2 (cut specimen)
Actual Diameter (mm)	17
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 140	9090.	38.1	Pice	None			S

Nagpur – Appa Saheb (1817-18), Sohagpur Mint – INO Shah Alam II – Silver

Drawings etc from Kulkarni
Part of Shah Alam legend		sanah [Ry] julus manus Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	~11
Actual Diameter (mm)	18
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 141	9091.	39.1	Rupee	1182	9			?

Nagpur – Appa Saheb (1817-18), Nagpur Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Silver

Known as ‘Naldar – Chandke undar boondkee’

Photos etc from Kulkarni
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Ahmad Shah Bahadur		Zarb Cuttack sanah [RY] julus maimanat manus Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	10.65
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 142	√ 9092.	40.1	Rupee	xxxx	5	Ste	Mine dated 81?	S

Nagpur – Raghuji III (1818-53), Nagpur Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Gold

Photos etc from Kulkarni
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Ahmad Shah Bahadur Differentiating mark:		Zarb Cuttack sanah [Ry] julus maimanat manus Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	5.55
Actual Diameter (mm)	24-25
Composition	Gold

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 143	9093.	62.1	Half Mohur	xxxx	5		Milled edge	Unique

Nagpur – Raghuji III (1818-53), Nagpur Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Silver – Type 1

Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Ahmad Shah Bahadur		Zarb Cuttack sanah [RY] julus maimanat manus Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	10.55
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 144	√ 9094.	50.1	Rupee	xxxx	5	Ste	Mine seems to be dated 51	S

Nagpur – Raghuji III (1818-53), Nagpur Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Silver – Type 2

Photos etc from Kulkarni
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Ahmad Shah Bahadur		Zarb Cuttack sanah [Ry] julus maimanat manus Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	5.2
Actual Diameter (mm)	16
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 145	9095.	51.1	Half Rupee	xxxx	[5]			R

Nagpur – Raghuji III (1818-53), Nagpur Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Silver – Type 3

Photos etc from Kulkarni
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Ahmad Shah Bahadur		Zarb Cuttack sanah [RY] julus maimanat manus Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	10.62
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 146	√ 9096.	52.1	Rupee		5	Ste	Mine dated 51(1)	S

Nagpur – Raghuji III (1818-53), Nagpur Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Silver – Type 4

Photos etc from Kulkarni
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Ahmad Shah Bahadur		Zarb Cuttack sanah [RY] julus maimanat manus Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	10.85
Actual Diameter (mm)	20
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 147	9097.	53.1	Rupee	xxxx	2			Unique

Nagpur – Raghuji III (1818-53), Nagpur Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Silver – Type 5

Photo from Baldwin (Fore)
Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Ahmad Shah Bahadur		Zarb Cuttack sanah [RY] julus maimanat manus

	Rupee	Half Rupee	Quarter Rupee	Eighth Rupee
Actual Weight (g)	10.9	5.39	2.71	1.38
Actual Diameter (mm)	23	17	15	12
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Rev	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 150	9098.	57.1	Rupee	I	xxxx	511			R
NG 151	9099.	57.2	”	II	xxxx	511			R
NG 152	9100.	56.1	Half Rupee	I	xxxx	511			R
NG 153	9101.	55.1	Quarter Rupee	I	xxxx	511			R
NG 154	9102.	54.1	Eighth Rupee	II	xxxx	511			S

Reverse Varieties

The differentiating marks on the reverse vary (drawings from Kulkarni)

I	II

Nagpur – Raghuji III (1818-53), Nagpur Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Silver – Type 6

Sikka mubarak badshah ghazi Ahmad Shah Bahadur		Zarb Cuttack sanah [RY] julus maimanat manus

	Rupee	Half Rupee	Quarter Rupee	Eighth Rupee
Actual Weight (g)	10.65-10.78	5.35	2.48	1.22
Actual Diameter (mm)	19-20	16	13	7
Composition	Silver

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Rev	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 155	√ 9103.	61.1	Rupee	I	xxxx	511	Ste		S
NG 156	9104.	61.2	”	II	xxxx				S
NG 157	√ 9105.	61.3	”	III	xxxx		Ste		C
NG 158	9106.	61.4	”	IV	xxxx				S
NG 159	9107.	61.5	”	V	xxxx				S
NG 160	9108.	60.1	Half Rupee	III	xxxx	511			S
NG 161	9109.	59.1	Quarter Rupee	III	xxxx	511			S
NG 162	√ 9110.	58.1	Eighth Rupee	III	xxxx	511	Ste	One of mine looks more like reverse IV	S

Reverse Varieties

The differentiating marks on the reverse vary (drawings from Kulkarni)

I	II	III	IV	V

Nagpur – Raghuji III (1818-53), Nagpur (written as Cuttack) Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Copper – Type 1

	Script from Kulkarni
Badshah ghazi Ahmad Shah Bahadur		A trisul with vestiges of a legend

Actual Weight (g)	10.2
Actual Diameter (mm)	18
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 164	√ 9111.	41.1	Pice	None	Ste		S

Nagpur – Raghuji III (1818-53), Nagpur (written as Cuttack) Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Copper – Type 2

Photos etc from Kulkarni
Ahmad Shah Badshah		Nagpur julus Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	10.02
Actual Diameter (mm)	16
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 165	9112.	42.1	Pice	None		Milled edges (sometimes only 2 of the 4)	S

Nagpur – Raghuji III (1818-53), Nagpur (written as Cuttack) Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Copper – Type 3

Photos etc from Kulkarni
Ahmad Shah badshah		A fish with part of a Persian legend

Actual Weight (g)	10.3
Actual Diameter (mm)	17
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 166	9113.	43.1	Pice	None			S

Nagpur – Raghuji III (1818-53), Nagpur (written as Cuttack) Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Copper – Type 4

	Script from Kulkarni
aḥmad shāh [bād]shāh. Differentiating mark:		ẓarb nagpur julūs

Actual Weight (g)	12.4-13.65
Actual Diameter (mm)	19-23
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Rev	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 170	√ 9114.	44.1	Pice	I	None	Ste	Round. Mine has another symbol to the left of the flag on the obverse	S
NG 171	9115.	44.2	”	I	”		Rectangular	S
NG 172	9116.	44.3	”	II	”			S
NG 173	9117.	44.4	”	III	”			S
NG 174	√ 9118.	44.5	”	IV	”	Ste	Round	S
NG 175	9119.	44.6	”	IV	”		Rectangular	S
NG 176	9120.	44.7	”	V	”			S
NG 177	9121.	44.8	”	VI	”			S

Reverse Varieties

The differentiating marks on the reverse vary (drawings from Kulkarni)

I	II	III	IV	V	VI

Nagpur – Raghuji III (1818-53), Nagpur (written as Cuttack) Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Copper – Type 5

Photos etc from Kulkarni
Ahmad Shah [bad]shah Differentiating mark:		Nagpur julūs Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	14.45
Actual Diameter (mm)	20
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 179	9122.	45.1	Pice	None			RR

Nagpur – Raghuji III (1818-53), Nagpur (written as Cuttack) Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Copper – Type 6

Photos etc from Kulkarni
Ahmad Shah [bad]shah. Differentiating mark:		Mintname (possibly Ganj) julus Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	13.1-13.3
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 180	9123.	46.1	Pice				Rectangular	R
NG 181	9124.	46.2	”				Round	R
NG 182	9125.	46.3	”				Rectangular, wide flan – 21mm	R

Nagpur – Raghuji III (1818-53), Nagpur (written as Cuttack) Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Copper – Type 7

	Script from Kulkarni
Ahmad Shah bādshāh		Nagpur? julūs Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	9.45
Actual Diameter (mm)	17
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 184	√ 9126.	47.1	Pice	None	Ste		S

Nagpur – Raghuji III (1818-53), Nagpur (written as Cuttack) Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Copper – Type 8

	Script from Kulkarni
aḥmad shāh bādshāh		nagpur julūs Differentiating mark:

Actual Weight (g)	9.25
Actual Diameter (mm)	18
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 185	√ 9127.	48.1	Pice	None	Ste, Zeno		S

Nagpur – Raghuji III (1818-53), Nagpur (written as Cuttack) Mint – INO Ahmad Shah – Copper – Type 9

Known as the Tirsoolee pice

Photos etc from Kulkarni
Ahmad Shah badshah		Nagpur julus

Actual Weight (g)	8.35-9.4
Actual Diameter (mm)	17-18
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Rev	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 186	√ 9128.	49.1	Pice	I	None	Ste, Zeno		C
NG 187	√ 9129.	49.2	”	II	”	Ste		C
NG 188	9130.	49.3	”	III	”			C

Reverse Varieties

The differentiating marks on the reverse vary (drawings from Kulkarni)

I	II	III

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 1

Photo & drawings from Kulkarni
Ladder		Crude legend

Actual Weight (g)
Actual Diameter (mm)
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 189	9131.	63.1	Pice	None			R

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 2

Photo & drawing from Kulkarni
Snake rising from charmer’s basket

Actual Weight (g)
Actual Diameter (mm)
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 190	9132.	64.1	Pice	None			R

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 3

Photos & Drawings from Kulkarni
Dagger		Crude legend

Actual Weight (g)	15.15
Actual Diameter (mm)	18
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 191	9133.	65.1	Pice	None			R

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 4

Photo & Drawings from Kulkarni
Trisul

Actual Weight (g)	20.2
Actual Diameter (mm)	22
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 192	9134.	66.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 5

Photos from Kulkarni
Padooka

Actual Weight (g)	17.15
Actual Diameter (mm)	17x21
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 194	9135.	67.1	Pice	None			R

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 6

Drawing & Photos from Kulkarni
Flower

Actual Weight (g)	18.9
Actual Diameter (mm)	20-25
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 195	9136.	68.1	Pice	None			R

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 7

Photos & drawing from Kulkarni
	Fish

Actual Weight (g)	17.85
Actual Diameter (mm)	17-25
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 196	9137.	69.1	Pice	None			R

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 8

Photos & Drawing from Kulkarni
Fish		Crude Shah

Actual Weight (g)	10.3
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 197	9138.	70.1	Pice	None			R

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint: Possibly Akot or Jalgaon-Jamod – Copper – Type 9

Photos & drawing from Kulkarni
Long Fish		Crude legend

Actual Weight (g)	~19
Actual Diameter (mm)	23
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 198	9139.	71.1	Pice	None			S

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 10

Palm of a hand	Crude legend

Actual Weight (g)	9.5
Actual Diameter (mm)	15
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 199	√ 9140.	72.1	Pice	None	Zeno		S

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 11

Flag		Mark like English W

Actual Weight (g)	12.35
Actual Diameter (mm)	18
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 200	9141.	73.1	Pice	None			R

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 12

Photos & drawings from Kulkarni
Wavy lines, possibly representing mountains or a river		Crossed lines. Possibly part of a legend

Actual Weight (g)	14.17
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 201	9142.	74.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 13

Photos & drawings from Kulkarni
Part of a tree

Actual Weight (g)	15.15
Actual Diameter (mm)	18
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 202	9143.	75.1	Pice	None			R

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 14

Photos & drawings from Kulkarni
Dumb-bell shaped object		Crude legend, possibly Shah

Actual Weight (g)	18.3
Actual Diameter (mm)	20
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 204	9144.	76.1	Pice	None			S

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 15

Although this type has been conventionally attributed to the Bhonslas of Nagpur, the iconography of the symbol on obverse suggests it to be a representation of Renuka, the mother goddess whose shrine is at Mahur in South Marathwada. Mahur was also a town of an eminent Jagirdar family which served under the Nizams (From Classical Numismatic Gallery).

Human face encircled by a snake or the word Shah		Crude legend

Actual Weight (g)	?
Actual Diameter (mm)	23
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 205	√ 9145.	77.1	Pice	None	ClassNG		RR

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 16

Photos & drawing from Kulkarni
A human face encircled by a snake, probably representing a Shiva lingam		Retrograde Julus and crude legend

Actual Weight (g)	?
Actual Diameter (mm)	23
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 207	9146.	77.2	Pice	None			RR

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 17

Photos & drawing from Kulkarni
Moon and star		Crude legend

Actual Weight (g)	12.55
Actual Diameter (mm)	13
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 208	9147.	78.1	Pice	None			S

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 18

Photos & drawing from Kulkarni
Circle		Crude legend

Actual Weight (g)	12.2
Actual Diameter (mm)	18
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 209	9148.	79.1	Pice	None			S

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 19

Photos & drawing from Kulkarni
Flower bud

Actual Weight (g)	17.5
Actual Diameter (mm)	22
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 210	9149.	80.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 20

Photos & drawing from Kulkarni
Mark like English A		Crude legend

Actual Weight (g)	16.45
Actual Diameter (mm)	22
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 211	9150.	81.1	Pice	None			S

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 21

Photos & drawing from Kulkarni
Mark like English BIB

Actual Weight (g)	14.65
Actual Diameter (mm)	18
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 213	9151.	82.1	Pice	None			S

Nagpur – Unattributed – With Symbols, Mint? – Copper – Type 22

Photos & drawing from Kulkarni
Mark like English B3		Crude legend

Actual Weight (g)	17.5
Actual Diameter (mm)	21
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 214	9152.	83.1	Pice	None			S

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 1

Photo from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	15.95
Actual Diameter (mm)	20
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 215	9153.	84.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 2

Photo from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	17.7
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 216	9154.	85.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 3

Photo from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	16.65
Actual Diameter (mm)	17
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 217	9155.	86.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 4

Photos from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	14.9
Actual Diameter (mm)	20
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 218	9156.	87.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 5

Photo from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	16.65
Actual Diameter (mm)	20
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 219	9157.	88.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 6

Photos from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	13.43
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 220	9158.	89.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 7

Photos from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	17.55
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 221	9159.	90.1	Pice				C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 8

Photos from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	15.85
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 222	9160.	91.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 9

Photos from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	14.05
Actual Diameter (mm)	15
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 224	9161.	92.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 10

Photos & drawing from Kulkarni
Figure resembling Persian numeral 4

Actual Weight (g)	14.95
Actual Diameter (mm)	18
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 225	9162.	93.1	Pice	None			R

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 11

Photos from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	16.2
Actual Diameter (mm)	17
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 226	9163.	94.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 12

Photos from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	12.35
Actual Diameter (mm)	18
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 227	9164.	95.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 13

Photos from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	14
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 228	9165.	96.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 14

Photos & drawing from Kulkarni
	Numeral 27, like Chanda rupees

Actual Weight (g)	20.25
Actual Diameter (mm)	20
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 230	9166.	97.1	Pice	None			R

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 15

Photos from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	16.45
Actual Diameter (mm)	20
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo List	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 231	9167.	98.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 16

Photos from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	15.15
Actual Diameter (mm)	18
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 233	9168.	99.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 17

Photos & drawings from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	18.9
Actual Diameter (mm)	22
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 234	9169.	100.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 18

Photos from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	16.15
Actual Diameter (mm)	22
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 235	9170.	101.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Unreadable Legends, Mint? – Copper – Type 19

Photos from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	16.35
Actual Diameter (mm)	18
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 236	9171.	102.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Light Weight, INO Shah Alam II – Mint? – Copper – Type 1

Photos & drawings from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	5.5
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 237	9172.	103.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Light Weight, INO Shah Alam II – Mint? – Copper – Type 1c

Photos from Kulkarni
Parallel lines

Actual Weight (g)
Actual Diameter (mm)
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 238	9173.	103.2	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Light Weight, INO Shah Alam II – Mint? – Copper – Type 1e

Shah		Blank

Actual Weight (g)
Actual Diameter (mm)
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 240	9174.	103.3	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Legible Persian Legends, INO Shah Alam II – Mint? – Copper – Type 1

Photos & drawings from Kulkarni

Actual Weight (g)	15.3
Actual Diameter (mm)	21
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Links	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 241	√ 9175.	104.1	Pice	None	Ste	Mine doesn’t look much like this but I put it here for convenience	R

Nagpur – Unattributed – Legible Persian Legends, INO Shah Alam II – Mint? – Copper – Type 2

Photos & drawings from Kulkarni

Mintname:

Actual Weight (g)	17.25
Actual Diameter (mm)	19
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 242	9176.	104.2	Pice	None			S

Nagpur – Unattributed – Legible Persian Legends, INO Shah Alam II – Mint? – Copper – Type 3

Photos & drawing from Kulkarni

Mintname:

Actual Weight (g)	15.35
Actual Diameter (mm)	20
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 243	9177.	104.3	Pice	1221			R
NG 243C	√ 9177c.		”	1122	Zeno	If the date is correct, this would place this one in the reign of Shāh Ālam Bahādur

Nagpur – Unattributed – Legible Persian Legends, INO Shah Alam II – Mint? – Copper – Type 4

Photos & drawings from Kulkarni

Mintname:

Actual Weight (g)	18.25
Actual Diameter (mm)	20
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	RY	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 244	9178.	104.4	Pice	xxx6	96			R

Nagpur – Unattributed – Legible Persian Legends, INO Shah Alam II – Mint? – Copper – Type 5

Photos & drawings from Kulkarni

Mintname:

Actual Weight (g)	17.7
Actual Diameter (mm)	20
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 245	9179.	104.5	Pice	1606 (1202)			R

Nagpur – Unattributed – Legible Persian Legends, INO Shah Alam II – Mint? – Copper – Type 6

Photos & drawings from Kulkarni
Retrograde legend	Retrograde legend

Actual Weight (g)	16.4
Actual Diameter (mm)	17
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 246	9180.	104.6	Pice	xxx6			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Legible Persian Legends, INO Shah Alam II – Mint? – Copper – Type 7

Photos & drawings from Kulkarni
+ over he of shah. sanah added at bottom

Actual Weight (g)	17.9
Actual Diameter (mm)	20
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	Ry	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 247	9181.	104.7	Pice	xx13	20			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Legible Persian Legends, INO Shah Alam II – Mint? – Copper – Type 8

Actual Weight (g)	18.2
Actual Diameter (mm)	20
Composition	Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	AH	Ry	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 248	9182.	105.1	Pice	xxxx	29			R

Nagpur – Unattributed – Legible Persian Legends, INO Shah Alam II – Mint? – Copper – Type 9

shāh ālam shāh		ẕafarābād

Actual Weight (g)

15.7

Actual Diameter (mm)

18

Composition

Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 249	√ 9183.	106.1	Pice	None	Zeno		R

Nagpur – Unattributed – Legible Persian Legends, INO Shah Alam II – Mint? – Copper – Type 10

Actual Weight (g)

18.15

Actual Diameter (mm)

21

Composition

Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 250	9184.	107.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Crude Copies of Elichpur Pice, INO Shah Alam II – Mint? – Copper – Type 1

shah ′ālam bādshāh

Actual Weight (g)

17.7

Actual Diameter (mm)

21

Composition

Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 251	9185.	108.1	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Crude Copies of Elichpur Pice, INO Shah Alam II – Mint? – Copper – Type 2

Crude execution	Crude execution

Actual Weight (g)

16.55

Actual Diameter (mm)

20

Composition

Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 252	9186.	108.2	Pice	None			C

Nagpur – Unattributed – Legible Nagari Legends, Nagari Legends – Mint? – Copper – Type 1

Nag (for snake or possibly contraction of Nagpur)		Blank

Actual Weight (g)

~12

Actual Diameter (mm)

21

Composition

Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 253	9187.	109.1	Pice	None			Unique

Nagpur – Unattributed – Legible Nagari Legends, Nagari Legends – Mint? – Copper – Type 2

Raj (possibly part of Maharaja)

Actual Weight (g)

16.65

Actual Diameter (mm)

19

Composition

Copper

Catalogue

Cat No.	Photo Link	Kul	Denomination	Date	Provenance	Comments	Rarity
NG 254	9188.	110.1	Pice	None			R